154
edits
Changes
no edit summary
{{BTH740 Index | 20113}}
= Teams =
The research project for this course is a team project. Each team has up to three members. Select team members so that you team has some degree of heterogeneity. Your members should not all share the same background and hold the same views.
<br />
To add a page to this wiki for your research project (if you are a student in BTH740, Fall of 2011):
* add an entry to the table below with the name of your project
* select the project name
** if the page does not exist, a new page will be created - copy the contents of the [[BTH740 Sample Research Project Page|Sample Research Project Page]] into the textbox of your research project page
** if the page exists, the page should appear
<br />
Use the following format for your table entry:
<br />
<pre>|[[User:WUN | FN]]||LN||[[TPN |TN]]||[mailto:LID@learn.senecac.on.ca?subject=BTH740 LID]
|-</pre>
<br />
Replace the placeholders with your own information:
* WUN: Your Wiki User name
* FN: Your First Name
* LN: Your Last Name
* TPN: Your Research Project Page Name on wiki
* TN: Your Research Project name
* LID: Your seneca email ID (learn id)
<br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" cellpadding="5"
|+ <big>List of Research Projects - Fall of 2011</big>
! First Name !! Last Name !! Project Name !! Seneca Id
|-
|[[User:Chris s| Chris]]||Szalwinski||[[BTH740 Sample Research Project Page|Project Page Name]]||[mailto:chris.szalwinski@senecac.on.ca?subject=bth740 chris.szalwinski]
|-
= Project Summary =
The project is in two parts. Each team selects three web sites of well-established international corporations.
For the first part, each team develops critical views of the selected sites based on the material presented in this course. Each criticism highlights the deficiencies of the site and includes a description of the member's background and how it has influence the evaluation. Other team members comment on each other's views. Each team submits a written document that documents its criticism in detail and presents a summary of its findings to the class.
For the second part, each team develops recommendations on how to improve the three sites and draws on the design material presented in the second half of the course as well as on the work of other teams in the course. Each team submits a written document that documents its criticism in detail and presents a summary of its work to the class.
= Presentation Schedule - Part 1 =
{| border="1" width="500px"
|}
<br />
