1
edit
Changes
→Test Notes
| 103 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/pschiiit/ Pschiiit] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || Zooming and navigating the canvas are so slow it hurts to watch. || Zooming and navigation are choppy. Very choppy. || Component, crayon and colour selection are perfect. Minimize button (floating grey box) is slightly slower than, and not as smooth as in Chromium. Zoom and canvas navigation take too long to respond. || Zoom and navigation are a mess, but drawing with the paintbrush is equivalent to Chromium - fast, smooth and perfect.
|-
| 104 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/reflections/ Reflections] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || Significantly slower than Chromium. Minefield: ~4-16fps Chromium: ~14-50fps || Objects were choppy when spinning (gets worse the more polygons the model had). Object rotation is choppy (sometimes freezes). || Minefield froze when I tried to adjust the size of the Browser window, then my whole computer froze. CPU usage was generally at 75in Minefield: 51%; 98Chromium: 50% at its worst (Rotating the Buddha). Response is good as far as selecting models and textures goes. || Extremely slow and extremely choppy. This experiment was pretty cool (first two models) until I saw how fast and smooth Chromium could run them...
|-
| 105 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/blob/ Blob] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || - || - || - || -
