1
edit
Changes
no edit summary
===Test Notes===
{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Test Number !!Name & URL !! Tester !! Date !! Firefox Performance - Speed !! Firefox Performance - Smoothness !! Firefox Performance - Responsiveness !! Notes and other Details
|-
|31 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-3d-engine/ Canvas 3d Engine] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Speed was very good, same as Chromium
|| Firefox was able to rotate the flat 2d images noticeably better than Chromium
|| Overall, Firefox definitely outperformed Chromium here.
|-
|32 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/lorenz-84/ Lorenz 84] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| -
|| -
|| -
|-
|33 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/apophis-2029// Apophis 2029] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| The foreground effects were noticeably slower in Firefox
|| Both browsers were about the same
|| This one was noticeably faster in Chromium
|-
|34 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/bing-bong/ Bing-Bong!] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Very fast
|| Very smooth
|| Both browsers performed equally well
|-
|35 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/juicydrop-liu5nh/ JuicyDrop] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Very fast
|| Very smooth
|| One of the visualization effects didn't work quite right in Chromium (and it REALLY stood out). Firefox on the other hand handled all of them without any trouble. Other than that, both browsers had equally high speed, smoothness and responsiveness. Because of the issue with visualization, I would give this one to Firefox
|-
|36 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/hascanvas/ HasCanvas] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Chromium was faster
|| Both browsers were the same
|| There was some start up lag in both browsers. This was more noticeable on Chromium. Still, Chromium outperformed Minefield
|-
|37 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-sketch/ Canvas Sketch] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Both browsers were the same
|| Both browsers were the same
|| The slowdowns mentioned in responsiveness was the only issue I could find in either browser. Chromium just narrowly outperformed Minefield
|-
|38 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/world-of-solitaire/ World of Solitaire] || [[User:sbologna|Stpehen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Chromium was slightly better
|| Both browsers were the same
|| There was an in-game option to adjust the speed. Using this option, Chromium displayed a more varied difference between its top speed and its lowest speed. Chromium outperformed Minefield
|-
|39 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/google-sphere/ Google Sphere] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Chromium was much faster
|| Both browsers were the same
|| Minefield's presentation looked much sloppier than Chromium. In Minefield, as the text got closer to the screen and grew larger, it also appeared to become 'bold' and less legible. Chromium very much outperformed Minefield here
|-
|40 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/js-fireworks/ JS Fireworks] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010
|| Very fast
|| There was a small amount of lag in the first second or two when the visualizations started in Firefox. Once things got going however, both browsers were very smooth
