Raspberry Pi - armv5tel vs armv6hl Benchmarks

Preliminary results only
More benchmarks to follow...

Here are some preliminary armv5tel vs armv6hl Raspberry Pi benchmarks performed by Jordan Cwang 2012-12-12 - 2012-12-19.

Tests were performed using the released F17 remix (armv5tel) and the F17 test image (armv6hl) running on identical 512MB Pi, with the same type of SD card, partitioning, network connection (private LAN to test host), and running services. The kernel was compiled for armv5 and the same on both systems.

Summary

Test	Units	Better is...	Test options	armv5tel results	armv6hl results	armv6hl improvement over armv5tel	Comments
GTKperf	seconds	lower	defaults	159.62	104.97	34%	Mirrors subjective comments made by users.
sysbench cpu	seconds	lower	--test=cpu run	865.4254	516.5205	40%
ApacheBench	seconds	lower	-n 2000 -c 10 (against static page on Pi)	139.787	174.240	-25%	Repeatable. Iteration value (2000) is high enough to moot caching issues. More investigation required.
yum	seconds	lower	install httpd / remove httpd	215.91 / 122.93	122.93 / 108.59	43% / 33%	10-run average coming soon.

GTKperf

armv5tel GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:07:28 2012 GtkEntry - time: 0.92 GtkComboBox - time: 24.14 GtkComboBoxEntry - time: 15.32 GtkSpinButton - time: 3.96 GtkProgressBar - time: 3.67 GtkToggleButton - time: 4.65 GtkCheckButton - time: 3.02 GtkRadioButton - time: 4.23 GtkTextView - Add text - time: 10.61 GtkTextView - Scroll - time: 6.64 GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time: 27.90 GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time: 35.73 GtkDrawingArea - Text - time: 17.22 GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time: 1.52 --- Total time: 159.62

armv6hl GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:08:38 2012 GtkEntry - time: 0.74 GtkComboBox - time: 11.29 GtkComboBoxEntry - time: 6.57 GtkSpinButton - time: 1.11 GtkProgressBar - time: 0.72 GtkToggleButton - time: 1.44 GtkCheckButton - time: 1.23 GtkRadioButton - time: 2.10 GtkTextView - Add text - time: 9.34 GtkTextView - Scroll - time: 4.72 GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time: 21.16 GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time: 27.95 GtkDrawingArea - Text - time: 14.98 GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time: 1.56 --- Total time: 104.97

armv6hl is about 34% faster than armv5tel

sysbench cpu

armv5tel sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 1 Doing CPU performance benchmark Threads started! Done. Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 10000 Test execution summary: total time: 865.4808s total number of events: 10000 total time taken by event execution: 865.4254 per-request statistics: min: 84.33ms avg: 86.54ms max: 431.30ms approx. 95 percentile: 90.00ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 10000.0000/0.00 execution time (avg/stddev): 865.4254/0.00

armv6hl sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 1 Doing CPU performance benchmark Threads started! Done. Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 10000 Test execution summary: total time: 516.5632s total number of events: 10000 total time taken by event execution: 516.5205 per-request statistics: min: 51.06ms avg: 51.65ms max: 114.26ms approx. 95 percentile: 54.66ms Threads fairness: events (avg/stddev): 10000.0000/0.00 execution time (avg/stddev): 516.5205/0.00

armv6hl is about 40% faster than armv5tel

ApacheBench

armv5tel This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking 10.0.0.6 (be patient) Server Software: Apache/2.2.22 Server Hostname: 10.0.0.6 Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 4609 bytes Concurrency Level: 10 Time taken for tests: 139.787 seconds Complete requests: 20000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Non-2xx responses: 20000 Total transferred: 96140000 bytes HTML transferred: 92180000 bytes Requests per second: 143.07 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 69.894 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 6.989 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 671.64 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 1 0.8 1 30 Processing: 5 69 132.6 17 2225 Waiting: 4 30 82.0 4 2102 Total: 5 70 132.6 18 2227 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 18 66% 86 75% 112 80% 127 90% 166 95% 204 98% 257 99% 319 100% 2227 (longest request)

armv6hl This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking 10.0.0.2 (be patient) Server Software: Apache/2.2.22 Server Hostname: 10.0.0.2 Server Port: 80 Document Path: / Document Length: 4609 bytes Concurrency Level: 10 Time taken for tests: 174.240 seconds Complete requests: 20000 Failed requests: 0 Write errors: 0 Non-2xx responses: 20000 Total transferred: 96140000 bytes HTML transferred: 92180000 bytes Requests per second: 114.78 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 87.120 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 8.712 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 538.84 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 0 1 1.6 1 34 Processing: 5 86 254.0 22 6580 Waiting: 4 42 125.7 6 4210 Total: 6 87 254.0 24 6581 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 24 66% 89 75% 121 80% 138 90% 186 95% 231 98% 295 99% 403 100% 6581 (longest request)

armv6tel is about 25% slower than armv5tel

yum

This test used yum to remove and install httpd after several runs to warm up cache, etc.

armv5tel Install: 42.66user 4.89system 3:35.91elapsed 22%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 35244maxresident)k 204016inputs+22000outputs (183major+29257minor)pagefaults 0swaps Remove: 20.52user 2.62system 2:42.62elapsed 14%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 27200maxresident)k 9976inputs+10776outputs (43major+18359minor)pagefaults 0swaps

armv6hl Install: 30.33user 2.96system 2:02.93elapsed 27%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 35168maxresident)k 0inputs+19208outputs (0major+21302minor)pagefaults 0swaps Remove: 14.03user 1.81system 1:48.59elapsed 14%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 25100maxresident)k 0inputs+8816outputs (0major+17893minor)pagefaults 0swaps

Installation is about 43% faster on armv6hl than armv5tel

Removal is about 33% faster on armv6hl than armv5tel