Difference between revisions of "Raspberry Pi - armv5tel vs armv6hl Benchmarks"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'Here are some preliminary armv5tel vs armv6hl benchmarks performed by Jordan Cwang 2012-12-12 to 2012-12-19: == GTKperf == {|width="100%" cellborder="0" cellpadding="0" cellspa…')
 
(→‎GTKperf)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
|'''armv6hl'''
 
|'''armv6hl'''
  
−
GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:08:38 2012
+
GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:08:38 2012
 
   
 
   
 
  GtkEntry - time:  0.74
 
  GtkEntry - time:  0.74
Line 46: Line 46:
 
  Total time: 104.97
 
  Total time: 104.97
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
armv6hl is 34% faster than armv5tel
 +
 +
== sysbench cpu ===
 +
 +
{|width="100%" cellborder="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="10"
 +
|-
 +
|'''armv5tel''
 +
 +
 +
sysbench 0.4.12:  multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark
 +
 +
Running the test with following options:
 +
Number of threads: 1
 +
 +
Doing CPU performance benchmark
 +
 +
Threads started!
 +
 +
 +
Done.
 +
 +
Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 10000
 +
 +
 +
Test execution summary:
 +
    total time:                          865.4808s
 +
    total number of events:              10000
 +
    total time taken by event execution: 865.4254
 +
    per-request statistics:
 +
        min:                                84.33ms
 +
        avg:                                86.54ms
 +
        max:                                431.30ms
 +
        approx.  95 percentile:              90.00ms
 +
 +
Threads fairness:
 +
    events (avg/stddev):          10000.0000/0.00
 +
    execution time (avg/stddev):  865.4254/0.00

Revision as of 14:58, 19 December 2012

Here are some preliminary armv5tel vs armv6hl benchmarks performed by Jordan Cwang 2012-12-12 to 2012-12-19:

GTKperf

armv5tel 
GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:07:28 2012

GtkEntry - time:  0.92
GtkComboBox - time: 24.14
GtkComboBoxEntry - time: 15.32
GtkSpinButton - time:  3.96
GtkProgressBar - time:  3.67
GtkToggleButton - time:  4.65
GtkCheckButton - time:  3.02
GtkRadioButton - time:  4.23
GtkTextView - Add text - time: 10.61
GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  6.64
GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time: 27.90
GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time: 35.73
GtkDrawingArea - Text - time: 17.22
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  1.52
 --- 
Total time: 159.62
armv6hl 
GtkPerf 0.40 - Starting testing: Tue Dec 18 17:08:38 2012

GtkEntry - time:  0.74
GtkComboBox - time: 11.29
GtkComboBoxEntry - time:  6.57
GtkSpinButton - time:  1.11
GtkProgressBar - time:  0.72
GtkToggleButton - time:  1.44
GtkCheckButton - time:  1.23
GtkRadioButton - time:  2.10
GtkTextView - Add text - time:  9.34
GtkTextView - Scroll - time:  4.72
GtkDrawingArea - Lines - time: 21.16
GtkDrawingArea - Circles - time: 27.95
GtkDrawingArea - Text - time: 14.98
GtkDrawingArea - Pixbufs - time:  1.56
 --- 
Total time: 104.97

armv6hl is 34% faster than armv5tel

sysbench cpu =

'armv5tel


sysbench 0.4.12: multi-threaded system evaluation benchmark

Running the test with following options: Number of threads: 1

Doing CPU performance benchmark

Threads started!


Done.

Maximum prime number checked in CPU test: 10000


Test execution summary: 

   total time:                          865.4808s
   total number of events:              10000
   total time taken by event execution: 865.4254
   per-request statistics:
        min:                                 84.33ms
        avg:                                 86.54ms
        max:                                431.30ms
        approx.  95 percentile:              90.00ms

Threads fairness: 

   events (avg/stddev):           10000.0000/0.00
   execution time (avg/stddev):   865.4254/0.00
Retrieved from "https://wiki.cdot.senecapolytechnic.ca/w/index.php?title=Raspberry_Pi_-_armv5tel_vs_armv6hl_Benchmarks&oldid=92115"