13,420
edits
Changes
no edit summary
'''msaul: (03-01-2012 @ 6:41 p.m.)'''
:* Please see my notes below (03-01-2012 @ 6:09 p.m.)
:* If emphasis has to be placed on two elements, the key would be the subject outline and the labs. For the subject outline to be completed, we need consensus on the evaluation element changes proposed. I would like to take a "crack" at the labs. I want to start working on a newer "lab1" (using more visual techniques) if that is OK with Chris and Brian.
:* Would be neat to have students run program (Bash Shell script?) that walked students over procedure for lab preparation (DO's and DON'Ts) and then have then answer some questions and have results sent to instructor to record their participation. This would "bridge the gap" until a more sophisticated graphical presentation/program was created. In other words, baby-steps into an "intensely great product" (as Steve Jobs would say)...
:* In the future, would an '''"object learning module"''' work better for the labs? In other words, students run an online program that discusses topic, then have the students perform the task. This "object learning module" could include evaluation for quiz, and have students submit to instructor. Also contain check-points. Apparently, Ian Tipson was associated with "Object Learning Models" and may provide useful insight / input.
:* As for course content, I did create weekly slides (for my survival) to emphasise certain concepts in class. Perhaps this can be a discussion-point for tweaking and improving for course notes, and then relegate text-based WIKI links to "Resources"...
::* Here are links to my slides for Week 1:
:::* http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~murray.saul/ops235/ops235w1_l1.odp
:::* http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~murray.saul/ops235/ops235w1_l2.odp
::* Let me know what you think
'''msaul: (03-01-2012 @ 6:09 p.m.)'''
