JSON Integration Adapter Code Review 3 Changes
Contents
- 1 General
- 2 GenericParser.java
- 3 XML_FormatString.message, XMLMessageParserTest.java
- 4 JSONWriter.java
- 5 JSONMarshaller.java
- 6 baseTypes.xsd
- 7 en.strings
- 8 JSONMessagePartMapping.java
- 9 RootJSONMessagePartMapping.java
- 10 XMLJSONMessageMappingLoader.java
- 11 JSONMessageFormatter.java
- 12 JSONMessageParser.java
- 13 JSONMessageTest.java
General
The most important changes are:
- Changing the terminology and the mapping property type around the mapping modes.
- Removing the circular ref and OID support, since they do not make sense for the integration engine.
- Refactoring of the message parser to remove the duplicated parsing logic (there are two possible approaches with this)
- Spaces generally must not be removed from existing files, as a trivial change and a goal in itself, since it makes it very hard to apply patches to already modified code.
These include src/nexj/core/scripting/GenericParser.java and /core/test/nexj/core/integration/format/xml/XMLMessageParserTest.java
GenericParser.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
Please undo (I have found only trivial space-removal changes) | Complete |
XML_FormatString.message, XMLMessageParserTest.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
Why have these been changed? Please undo. | Complete |
JSONWriter.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
Please undo all the method renaming - this breaks a number of classes in the enterprise project, and was not needed in the first place.
Trivial code modifications are discouraged, since they tend to complicate merges and sometimes, like in this case, even break code. |
Complete |
Remove TOKEN_END_OBJECT and TOKEN_END_ARRAY public constants.
The object and array should be closed by invoking a corresponding method on JSONWriter. Having these constants exposes implementation details and breaks any attempts to subclass this class. |
Complete |
Remove writeBoolean(Boolean). It will break if the value is null, and is not really needed. Invoke writeBoolean(boolean) instead. | Complete |
JSONMarshaller.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
Undo the trivial method renaming | Complete |
baseTypes.xsd
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
Array is JSON - leave only one space after JSON | Complete |
Node -> message part | Complete |
'It is also called "typed array".' -> remove this phrase | Complete |
typed array -> root. Put this after the array. | Complete |
mode -> subtype | Complete |
root". The subtype should be empty by default. | Complete |
We should have a "name" attribute for mapping object part keys, as well as subtypes for dates and binary values, like in the XML formatter | Complete |
en.strings
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
err.integration.json.parse.binary.expectedString=Error parsing binary for "{0}", was expecting a string value but found\: {1}. -> err.integration.json.parse.binary=Invalid binary value for message part "{0}" (expected a string). |
Complete |
Do not include actual data values in error messages, for privacy reasons. err.integration.json.parse.binary.invalidBase64=Invalid base64 format for message part "{0}". |
Complete |
*err.integration.json.parse.duplicateKey=Found duplicate key\: "{0}". -> err.integration.json.parse.duplicateKey=Duplicate object key\: "{0}".
|
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.oidExpectedString=Error parsing OID for "{0}", was expecting a string value but found\: {1}. -> err.integration.json.parse.oid =Invalid OID for message part "{0}" (expected a string). |
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.oidInvalidBase64=Error parsing OID for "{0}", invalid base64 format at\: Line "{1}", Column "{2}". -> err.integration.json.parse.base64= Invalid base64 value for message part "{0}". |
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.primitiveTypeMismatch=Error parsing "{0}", was expecting a {1} value but found\: {2}. -> err.integration.json.parse.typeMismatch=Type mismatch in message part "{0}" (expected a "{1}"). |
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.requiredValueNull=Error parsing "{0}", required part cannot be "null". -> err.integration.json.parse.requiredNull=Required message part "{0}" is null. |
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.timestamp=Error parsing timestamp for "{0}", was expecting a number value but found\: {1}. -> err.integration.json.parse.timestamp=Invalid timestamp for message part "{0}" (expected a numeric value). |
Complete |
err.integration.json.parse.unexpectedToken=Error parsing "{0}", was expecting "{1}" but found "{2}". -> err.integration.json.parse.unexpectedToken=Unexpected token in message part "{0}" (expected "{1}"). |
Complete |
err.meta.integration.json.anyOrdinalCannotHaveFormat=Primitive message part "{0}" of type any ordinal cannot have a format string. -> err.meta.integration.json.anyFormat=Primitive message part "{0}" of type any cannot have a format pattern. |
Complete |
err.meta.integration.json.invalidMessageFormatMode=Invalid message format mode "{0}" in RootJSONMessagePartMapping for "{1}". -> err.meta.integration.json.invalidSubtype=Invalid subtype "{0}" in the mapping of message part "{1}". |
Complete |
err.meta.integration.json.invalidTypedArray.notCollection=Typed array message {0} child part must be a collection. -> no, not really. Remove. |
Complete |
err.meta.integration.json.invalidTypedArray.notOnePart=Typed array message {0} may only have one child part. -> err.meta.integration.json.rootChild =Root message part "{0}" must have exactly one child part. |
Complete |
JSONMessagePartMapping.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
move m_sFormat, m_bQuote up, into the // attributes section - this is a coding convention | Complete |
m_bQuote -> m_bQuoted | Complete |
ToBeQuoted -> Quoted | Compelte |
Group setter and getters together logically, in the beginning of the operations: setter1 getter1 setter2 getter2... Having the operations grouped alphabetically makes it hard to read the code. |
Complete |
RootJSONMessagePartMapping.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
RootJSONMessagePartMapping -> CompositeJSONMessagePartMapping (since it is not just for the root message part, right?) | Complete |
m_nMessageFormat -> m_nSubtype | Complete |
Defaults to {@link RootJSONMessagePartMapping#FORMAT_OBJECT}. - remove the comment and assign the actual value instead. | Complete |
static final -> final static (convention) | Complete |
FORMAT_ -> SUBTYPE_ | Complete |
FORMAT_TYPED_ARRAY -> SUBTYPE_ROOT = 2 | Complete |
Move constants up, before the attributes | Complete |
MessageFormatMode -> Subtype; The validation is not needed, since it will be validated in the loader when parsing the symbol value. | Complete |
XMLJSONMessageMappingLoader.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
throw new MetadataException("err.meta.integration.json.anyOrdinalCannotHaveFormat", new Object[]{part.getFullPath()});
|
Complete |
|
Compelte |
All regexp pattern should be precompiled in final static constants. | Complete |
JSONMessageFormatter.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
We should format or parse message part without OIDs and circular refs. The integration engine is designed to deal with hierarchical messages and circular ones can get it into faulty code paths. |
Complete |
m_objectMap - not needed anymore | Complete |
formatCompositeMessagePart - instead of using nChar, invoke the corresponding writer output methods. | Complete |
Remove the OID management code | Complete |
Add code for handling the primitive subtypes (hex, base64, dateTime, date, time) | Complete |
|
Complete |
Do not use j as a counter. Use k instead. j looks like i under many fonts. | Complete |
writePrimitive - use a switch for nPartType, rather than several if statements. | Complete |
JSONMessageParser.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
m_objectMap - not needed anymore | Complete |
The overridden methods, like parseObject(), parseElement(), parseArray() etc have a very similar logic to the superclass methods. To avoid duplication, it is better to handle any custom logic needed in these with template methods, like constructing a TransferObject instead of a hashtab e.g. Object createObject(), addObjectValue(Object obj, String sKey, Object value), createArray(), Object addArrayValue(Object array, Object value). The overriden methods parse* will save and restore the current message part and will check if the structure they parse corresponds to the current message part type and mapping. |
Complete (Implemented a hybrid, message table parsing uses a second pass, while direct parsing uses overridden methods) |
It should be possible to parse a primitive message, e.g. 1 or "abc". The mapping for this has subtype="root" and the only message part corresponds to this primitive type. | Complete |
parsePartValue - m_currentMessagePart .isCollection() - remove the space | Complete |
initializeMessageTable - it is possible to support more than one message with an object subtype. The mapping can support an additional property key="<key>:<value>", designating a key and a value, which must establish a unique combination for identifying the message in the table. This way we can have also message polymorphism (later phase?). | Complete |
JSONMessageTest.java
Tasks | Status |
---|---|
FORMART -> FORMAT | Complete |