GPU610/OctoPig

From CDOT Wiki
Revision as of 22:52, 20 February 2013 by Capilkey (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


GPU610/DPS915 | Student List | Group and Project Index | Student Resources | Glossary

TBA

Team Members

  1. Chad Pilkey
  2. Justin Robinson

subject=gpu610 Email All

Progress

Assignment 1

We began by profiling two things: a string-comparison algorithm, and a program which develops quasi-random visuals from an initial seed using a Turing Machine algorithm.


Justin's Findings

String comparison was not a good choice. If anything, it makes more sense to do string comparison in a serial fashion than in parallel. Comparing two strings of over 13,000 characters each in such a fashion as to force the algorithm to compare them all just barely results in a runtime of 0.001 seconds.


Chad's Profiling Findings

Chad, fill this in.


Analysis: Of our two selections, the choice to move forward with the pattern generator is clear.

Difficulties Met:

One apparent difficulty is the need to port the pattern-generator from Javascript into C in order to make use of CUDA.


Summary:

  • String comparison is not an efficient use of parallel programming practises.


Resources:


Assignment 2

Assignment 3