Difference between revisions of "SRA840 Lab1"
(→Kezhong Liang) |
(→Kezhong Liang) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
2. FreeBSD uses one of the slice of a disk as SWAP and Fedora uses individual partition as SWAP. | 2. FreeBSD uses one of the slice of a disk as SWAP and Fedora uses individual partition as SWAP. | ||
3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. | 3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. | ||
| − | 4. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. | + | 4. FreeBSD uses text-based sysinstall utility to install OS and Fedora uses graphic mode. |
| + | 5. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. | ||
'''Pros of FreeBSD installation process ''' | '''Pros of FreeBSD installation process ''' | ||
Some cons here.. | Some cons here.. | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 19 January 2009
SRA840 Lab1
REFERENCES
Answers
Kezhong Liang
Differences between FreeBSD and Fedora installation 1. FreeBSD uses the concept of Slice and doesn't support the operation to the logical partition. 2. FreeBSD uses one of the slice of a disk as SWAP and Fedora uses individual partition as SWAP. 3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. 4. FreeBSD uses text-based sysinstall utility to install OS and Fedora uses graphic mode. 5. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. Pros of FreeBSD installation process Some cons here.. Cons of FreeBSD installation process Some Pros here... differences in disk drives labeling and supported file systems Something... files in the /etc directory (what each of them do) Something... setting up a network Something... start-up scripts in FreeBSD Something...
