Difference between revisions of "SPO600 Inline Assembler Lab"
Yanhao Lei (talk | contribs) (→Lab 7) |
(→Lab 7) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* bunny | * bunny | ||
* busybox | * busybox | ||
− | * chicken | + | * chicken |
* cln | * cln | ||
* coq | * coq | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* libfame | * libfame | ||
* libgcroots | * libgcroots | ||
− | * libmad | + | * libmad (Berwout) |
* libmlx4 | * libmlx4 | ||
* lightsparc | * lightsparc |
Revision as of 10:53, 24 February 2016
Lab 7
1. Select one of the following open source packages which is not claimed by another person in the class. Put your name beside it in (parenthesis) to claim it.
- amule
- ardour
- avidemux
- blender
- bunny
- busybox
- chicken
- cln
- coq
- cxxtools
- faad2
- fawkes
- filezilla (DOES NOT HAVE ASM)
- gauche
- gmime
- gnash (Yanhao)
- gridengine
- groonga
- hoard
- iaxclient
- k9copy
- lame (Kenny)
- libfame
- libgcroots
- libmad (Berwout)
- libmlx4
- lightsparc
- mediatomb
- mjpegtools
- mlt
- mosh
- mpich2
- ocaml-zarith
- openblas
- opencore-amr
- openser
- par2cmdline
- picprog
- qlandkartegt
- sooperlooper (Nina)
- traverso
2. Find the assembler in that software, and determine:
- How much assembley-language code is present
- Which platform(s) it is used on
- Why it is there (what it does)
- What happens on other platforms
- Your opinion of the value of the assembler code VS the loss of portability/increase in complexity of the code.
3. Blog your results in detail.