Difference between revisions of "User:RHung/FSOSS 2011"
(→Introduction) |
(→Free and Open Source Strategy as Practice: Participant Perspectives - Mekki MacAuley) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
While I really enjoyed the talks, the two perspectives that will be discussed will the presentations by Mekki MacAulay and Eben Upton. | While I really enjoyed the talks, the two perspectives that will be discussed will the presentations by Mekki MacAulay and Eben Upton. | ||
| − | ==Free and Open Source Strategy as Practice: Participant Perspectives - Mekki | + | ==Free and Open Source Strategy as Practice: Participant Perspectives - Mekki MacAulay== |
| + | Mekki MacAulay's presentation revolved around the study of various open source practices that may either help or hinder a group's growth. The study was still a work in progress, however, the amount of research and the correlations that resulted from the in-depth interviews he conducted were fascinating to me. The purpose of the study was to analyze the practices of open source communities and to see how the different types of practices affect the functioning of the community. Mr. MacAulay mapped the various routines that occurred in multiple open source communities (given to him via interviews with members of various involvement) to four categories. Practices were considered an enabling practice if the action was considered a positive interaction and motivating for the person and a disabling practice if it had the opposite effect (these two categories were from the research by Mantere). As well, if the practice was codified it was considered to be a recursive practice; whereas the opposite would be classified as an adaptive practice. After categorizing the practices, Mr. MacAulay found that things weren't as simple as "recursive practices are disabling" and "adaptive practices are enabling." The results showed that recursive practices had instances that were considered enabling, and adaptive practices that were considered disabling. Further analysis showed that the stage of the open source community (well established or fairly new) had an effect on whether or not a recursive practice was seen as enabling or disabling. The same applied for adaptive. I found this fascinating, because the projects that were offered to us had communities that ranged from recent (paladin/gladius) to fairly mature (processing.js). | ||
| + | |||
==A Slice of Raspberry Pi - Eben Upton== | ==A Slice of Raspberry Pi - Eben Upton== | ||
==Personal Reflections== | ==Personal Reflections== | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 3 November 2011
Contents
Free Software and Open Source Symposium 2011
Introduction
The Free Software and Open Source Symposium (FSOSS) is an annual event where speakers discuss open source and free software projects and subjects that influence the open source world. The conference spanned 3 days from Thursday to Saturday. Thursday was when the workshops occurred; I attended the Processing.js workshop hosted by Jon Buckley and Dave Humphrey and then the Android Development workshop by Simon Chang. Friday and Saturday were when the presentations occurred. The presentations I went to were:
- "How to start an Internet Famous Business with Open Source Software" by Mike Hoye
- "Building a Commercial Game Using Processing.js for Cross-Platform Delivery" by Dawn Mercer, Jeremy Friedberg, Daniel Hodgin, and David Perit
- "Free and Open Strategy as Practice: Participant Perspectives" by Mekki MacAulay
- "A Slice of Raspberry Pi" by Eben Upton
- "Introduction to the Google Android Platform" by Simon Chang
- "When you cannot be there... Remote access and collaboration" by Raul Suarez
- "How Web Browsers Work" by Ehsan Akhgari
While I really enjoyed the talks, the two perspectives that will be discussed will the presentations by Mekki MacAulay and Eben Upton.
Free and Open Source Strategy as Practice: Participant Perspectives - Mekki MacAulay
Mekki MacAulay's presentation revolved around the study of various open source practices that may either help or hinder a group's growth. The study was still a work in progress, however, the amount of research and the correlations that resulted from the in-depth interviews he conducted were fascinating to me. The purpose of the study was to analyze the practices of open source communities and to see how the different types of practices affect the functioning of the community. Mr. MacAulay mapped the various routines that occurred in multiple open source communities (given to him via interviews with members of various involvement) to four categories. Practices were considered an enabling practice if the action was considered a positive interaction and motivating for the person and a disabling practice if it had the opposite effect (these two categories were from the research by Mantere). As well, if the practice was codified it was considered to be a recursive practice; whereas the opposite would be classified as an adaptive practice. After categorizing the practices, Mr. MacAulay found that things weren't as simple as "recursive practices are disabling" and "adaptive practices are enabling." The results showed that recursive practices had instances that were considered enabling, and adaptive practices that were considered disabling. Further analysis showed that the stage of the open source community (well established or fairly new) had an effect on whether or not a recursive practice was seen as enabling or disabling. The same applied for adaptive. I found this fascinating, because the projects that were offered to us had communities that ranged from recent (paladin/gladius) to fairly mature (processing.js).
