Difference between revisions of "News-dev.tech.xpcom-09/29/2006"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=== Announcements === | === Announcements === | ||
*[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom/browse_thread/thread/b3865fd9fec13f63/c0d15cd887d6cb4c#c0d15cd887d6cb4c Java vs. XPCOM] | *[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom/browse_thread/thread/b3865fd9fec13f63/c0d15cd887d6cb4c#c0d15cd887d6cb4c Java vs. XPCOM] | ||
| − | **discussion of the | + | **discussion of the limitation and merits of Java in place of XPCOM. |
*[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom/browse_thread/thread/f10e4fc77a219fd1/da5c6497ab7381ba#da5c6497ab7381ba xpidl.exe crashes on Windows] | *[http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom/browse_thread/thread/f10e4fc77a219fd1/da5c6497ab7381ba#da5c6497ab7381ba xpidl.exe crashes on Windows] | ||
**problem with creating header files from IDL's in 1.8 branch due to wrong compiler. | **problem with creating header files from IDL's in 1.8 branch due to wrong compiler. | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 29 September 2006
Summary: mozilla.dev.tech.xpcom - 09/29/2006
Announcements
- Java vs. XPCOM
- discussion of the limitation and merits of Java in place of XPCOM.
- xpidl.exe crashes on Windows
- problem with creating header files from IDL's in 1.8 branch due to wrong compiler.
