|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {| style="background: #dfdfdf; border: 1px solid black;"
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | | '''THIS PAGE IS A DRAFT.''' '''The title of this page is not meant to reflect any branding.''' It's just a place to keep notes developed from the post-panel discussions at the [http://fsoss.senecac.on.ca/2008/?q=node/38 Teaching Open Source track] of [http://2008.fsoss.com FSOSS 2008].
| |
| − | |}
| |
| | | | |
| − |
| |
| − | == Apprentice and teaching models ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * How do open source projects contribute time, energy
| |
| − | * Financial models
| |
| − | * Bringing open source into humanities/social sciences
| |
| − |
| |
| − | System Biz model vs. Practice ????
| |
| − | * List of ???? that need to be written (????)
| |
| − | * Hand holding to point contributors to a better (????) place
| |
| − | * Application of projects to ???? (????) requires additional tasks that need work
| |
| − | * Profiling of projects
| |
| − | * Creation of "safe plpaces" where ????
| |
| − | * ?????
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Professional incentives ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Skills to teach OS
| |
| − | * How to embed in a community
| |
| − | * Offices of technical transfer
| |
| − | * Tenure, research, training
| |
| − | * Teach open source culture to students earlier in program
| |
| − | * Adopt open source software
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == What can we do together going forward? ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Academics
| |
| − | * Business
| |
| − | * Foundations
| |
| − | * Open source communities
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Outline who is out there doing what
| |
| − | * Consortium of "us" -- people serious about growing teaching model (funding)
| |
| − | * Identify 1 or 2 new places where open source can be taught
| |
| − | * How do you educate government?
| |
| − | ** Get serious partners
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Key lessons ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Publications != open source participation
| |
| − | * Develop understanding of value
| |
| − | * No incentive (personal)
| |
| − | * Sponsors
| |
| − | ** Real contribution
| |
| − | ** Reading of talent
| |
| − | * Have open source contributors "in residence" at universities
| |
| − | * Generate confidence by participating
| |
| − | * Trust and validation
| |
| − | * Expanding academics involved + business schools
| |
| − | * How do we evaluate students?
| |
| − | * How do we get involved?
| |
| − | * Senior open source people mentored the professor and conveyed reputation
| |
| − | * What do programs need to competent
| |
| − | * Community's investment in teaching or helping teaching
| |
| − | * What's the upper limit of a community/growth?
| |
| − | ** Godfrey
| |
| − | * How do open source communities structure themselves to be open to participation and scalable?
| |
| − | * Involve technical writing program
| |
| − | * Colleges vs. universities == teaching vs. research
| |
