Difference between revisions of "TOS Consortium Discussion"
Chris Tyler (talk | contribs) |
PaulFrields (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* To provide a place to work out Open Source educational models, support and funding schemes, community relationships, and other issues. | * To provide a place to work out Open Source educational models, support and funding schemes, community relationships, and other issues. | ||
* To advocate for the changes that are necessary to further the goal of teaching Open Source. | * To advocate for the changes that are necessary to further the goal of teaching Open Source. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Notes from discussion whiteboard == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Apprentice and teaching models === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * How do open source projects contribute time, energy | ||
| + | * Financial models | ||
| + | * Bringing open source into humanities/social sciences | ||
| + | |||
| + | System Biz model vs. Practice ???? | ||
| + | * List of ???? that need to be written (????) | ||
| + | * Hand holding to point contributors to a better (????) place | ||
| + | * Application of projects to ???? (????) requires additional tasks that need work | ||
| + | * Profiling of projects | ||
| + | * Creation of "safe plpaces" where ???? | ||
| + | * ????? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Professional incentives === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Skills to teach OS | ||
| + | * How to embed in a community | ||
| + | * Offices of technical transfer | ||
| + | * Tenure, research, training | ||
| + | * Teach open source culture to students earlier in program | ||
| + | * Adopt open source software | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What can we do together going forward? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Academics | ||
| + | * Business | ||
| + | * Foundations | ||
| + | * Open source communities | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Outline who is out there doing what | ||
| + | * Consortium of "us" -- people serious about growing teaching model (funding) | ||
| + | * Identify 1 or 2 new places where open source can be taught | ||
| + | * How do you educate government? | ||
| + | ** Get serious partners | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Key lessons === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Publications != open source participation | ||
| + | * Develop understanding of value | ||
| + | * No incentive (personal) | ||
| + | * Sponsors | ||
| + | ** Real contribution | ||
| + | ** Reading of talent | ||
| + | * Have open source contributors "in residence" at universities | ||
| + | * Generate confidence by participating | ||
| + | * Trust and validation | ||
| + | * Expanding academics involved + business schools | ||
| + | * How do we evaluate students? | ||
| + | * How do we get involved? | ||
| + | * Senior open source people mentored the professor and conveyed reputation | ||
| + | * What do programs need to competent | ||
| + | * Community's investment in teaching or helping teaching | ||
| + | * What's the upper limit of a community/growth? | ||
| + | ** Godfrey | ||
| + | * How do open source communities structure themselves to be open to participation and scalable? | ||
| + | * Involve technical writing program | ||
| + | * Colleges vs. universities == teaching vs. research | ||
Revision as of 14:53, 23 October 2008
The Teaching Open Source track at FSOSS 2008 converged on the idea of a Consortium to further the discussion between Open Source Communities, Educational Institutions, and Businesses. This page is devoted to concrete planning for such a group.
Edit this page ruthlessly!
Two primary goals for this group:
- To provide a place to work out Open Source educational models, support and funding schemes, community relationships, and other issues.
- To advocate for the changes that are necessary to further the goal of teaching Open Source.
Contents
Notes from discussion whiteboard
Apprentice and teaching models
- How do open source projects contribute time, energy
- Financial models
- Bringing open source into humanities/social sciences
System Biz model vs. Practice ????
- List of ???? that need to be written (????)
- Hand holding to point contributors to a better (????) place
- Application of projects to ???? (????) requires additional tasks that need work
- Profiling of projects
- Creation of "safe plpaces" where ????
- ?????
Professional incentives
- Skills to teach OS
- How to embed in a community
- Offices of technical transfer
- Tenure, research, training
- Teach open source culture to students earlier in program
- Adopt open source software
What can we do together going forward?
- Academics
- Business
- Foundations
- Open source communities
- Outline who is out there doing what
- Consortium of "us" -- people serious about growing teaching model (funding)
- Identify 1 or 2 new places where open source can be taught
- How do you educate government?
- Get serious partners
Key lessons
- Publications != open source participation
- Develop understanding of value
- No incentive (personal)
- Sponsors
- Real contribution
- Reading of talent
- Have open source contributors "in residence" at universities
- Generate confidence by participating
- Trust and validation
- Expanding academics involved + business schools
- How do we evaluate students?
- How do we get involved?
- Senior open source people mentored the professor and conveyed reputation
- What do programs need to competent
- Community's investment in teaching or helping teaching
- What's the upper limit of a community/growth?
- Godfrey
- How do open source communities structure themselves to be open to participation and scalable?
- Involve technical writing program
- Colleges vs. universities == teaching vs. research
