Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Init vs systemd

221 bytes added, 15:41, 6 February 2012
no edit summary
In many ways, the init process is the "ancestor process" and any process that is currently running on the Unix/Linux system is either directly or indirectly related to the init process.
Traditionally, the '''init program would run default processes ''' that were defined in "shell scripts" contained in appropriate '''run-level''' directory. The run level is a defined state that the Unix/Linux system is currently in (for example, graphical-mode, text-based mode with networking, text-based mode without networking, etc).
== Why Switch to systemd? ==
Yes, the concept is very easy to understand. '''On the other hand, with modern operating systems, there is pressure to "evolve" into more efficent running operating systems'''. For example, in many ways both Apple creators and Unix/Linux creators have influenced each other to build better operating systems over the past decade. The Apple Mac OSX operating system uses a variation of the Unix kernel. On the other hand, Unix/Linux developpers have noticed Apple's method of running services in parallel as opposed to in sequence.
'''Note: Although Linux operating systems (other than Fedora) still use init, systemd is compatible with init, but systemd is likely to replace init for all Unix/Linux distributions in the future...'''
= systemd: Command Usage =
== General Concept ==
13,420
edits

Navigation menu