Difference between revisions of "Bug Tracker for Pidora"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Project News)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Project Description ==
 
== Project Description ==
Trac is an open source Project management and bug tracking system.  It is the system currently employed to keep track of bugs for Pidora.  As with everything on the internet, there are those that use it as it is intended; but you also have a group of people that derive pleasure by abusing it and spamming the system.  There are many available modules to help control the incoming spam.  While spam cannot be completely eliminated, it can be significantly reduced, and what is able to squeeze in through the automated controls, is easily dealt with by the administrator.
+
Trac is an open source Project management and bug tracking system.  It is the system currently employed to keep track of bugs for Pidora.  As with everything on the internet, there are those that use it as it is intended; but you also have a group of people that derive pleasure by abusing it and spamming the system (bunch of jerks!).  There are many available modules to help control the incoming spam.  While spam cannot be completely eliminated, it can be significantly reduced, and what is able to squeeze in through the automated controls, is easily dealt with by the administrator.
  
 
== Project Leader ==
 
== Project Leader ==
  
[[User:Sung_Hwan_Kim | Sung Hwan Kim]]
+
[[User:Sung_Hwan_Kim | Sung Hwan Kim]]<br/>
 
[http://professorplumpi.wordpress.com/ professorplumpi blog]
 
[http://professorplumpi.wordpress.com/ professorplumpi blog]
  
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
== Project Details ==
 
== Project Details ==
While I have the option of continuing to use Trac or switching to BugZilla, I believe I will continue with Trac, as much of it is already implemented (however this does not mean I am closed to the idea of switching to BugZilla; should this avenue show more promise in the future)Trac has several internal and external filtering strategies, which can be found [http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter here].  I will update this section as I get a chance to test the different options available.
+
Originally I had thought to keep Trac, and simply upgrade any necessary components to implement [http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/SpamFilter Trac spam filtering modules].  However, after being informed of the current version of the system, it seems it would be equal effort begin from scratch.  In light of this BugZilla seems to be the better choice; having been originally developed and used by the Mozilla ProjectAlso, it is currently employed by " [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Foundation Mozilla Foundation], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation Wikimedia Foundation], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit WebKit], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA NASA], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo! Yahoo!], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME GNOME], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KDE KDE], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Software_Foundation Apache], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat Red Hat] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novell Novell]" (Wikipedia)This avenue may prove to be more robust in the future as it will lend to better performance and scalability.  Trac on the other hand is currently deploying version 1.0 as the stable release, the previous version (and installed currently as the bug tracker for Pidora) is version 0.12. 
  
 
<!-- Provides more depth than the Project Description. This is the place for technical discussions, project specs, or other details. If this gets very long, you might consider breaking this part into multiple pages and linking to them. -->
 
<!-- Provides more depth than the Project Description. This is the place for technical discussions, project specs, or other details. If this gets very long, you might consider breaking this part into multiple pages and linking to them. -->
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
=== Tracking ===
 
=== Tracking ===
Trac to track Trac? =)
+
While there isn't much version control needed, I may use git to keep changes to configuration files as I work on them.
 
<!-- Describe the tracking mechanisms you are using for your project (bugzilla, trac, github, ...) -->
 
<!-- Describe the tracking mechanisms you are using for your project (bugzilla, trac, github, ...) -->
  
Line 35: Line 35:
 
<!-- Note: Each student must have unique goals. These goals may be ''related'' to other students' work, but must be ''distinct'' and ''attainable'' regardless of the state of the other students' work. For example, under the umbrella of one project title, one student may work on packaging a piece of software and another may work on documentation, or one may work on solving one bug and another on solving another bug, but two students must not work on the same bug or depend on the other students' work in order to be able to complete their own project. -->
 
<!-- Note: Each student must have unique goals. These goals may be ''related'' to other students' work, but must be ''distinct'' and ''attainable'' regardless of the state of the other students' work. For example, under the umbrella of one project title, one student may work on packaging a piece of software and another may work on documentation, or one may work on solving one bug and another on solving another bug, but two students must not work on the same bug or depend on the other students' work in order to be able to complete their own project. -->
 
* 0.1
 
* 0.1
**Research and test each of the modules that look promising
+
**Decide between BugZilla(currently the leader), and Trac.
 +
**Install chosen application and any necessary spam filtering modules on a local machine/drive.
 +
**Test installation against spam (possibly use cases already in Pidora bug tracker).
 
* 0.2
 
* 0.2
**Implement the modules that show significant decrease in spam
+
**Implement application (and modules) on Production environment.
 
* 0.3
 
* 0.3
**???Profit
+
**Make any necessary changes to enhance performance.
 +
 
 
== Communication ==
 
== Communication ==
  
Line 64: Line 67:
  
 
== Project News ==
 
== Project News ==
 +
After much testing on virtual machines, I have successfully installed Bugzilla on the production server expected to host this service.  I have tried to match the current bug tracking system on Trac, interface wise, so current users should not notice too much different in using it.
  
 +
I will now be attempting to customize the site, and hopefully get the Pidora logo to show up on the front page.  I am by no means a web developer, and my limited perl skills have been sitting on a shelf for well over a year.  Wish me luck!
 
<!-- This is where a permanent record of your releases and updates will go. In these you should discuss the status or your work, your interactions with other members of the community (e.g., Seneca and Mozilla), problems you have encountered, etc. -->
 
<!-- This is where a permanent record of your releases and updates will go. In these you should discuss the status or your work, your interactions with other members of the community (e.g., Seneca and Mozilla), problems you have encountered, etc. -->

Latest revision as of 12:49, 23 November 2013

Bug Tracker for Pidora

Project Description

Trac is an open source Project management and bug tracking system. It is the system currently employed to keep track of bugs for Pidora. As with everything on the internet, there are those that use it as it is intended; but you also have a group of people that derive pleasure by abusing it and spamming the system (bunch of jerks!). There are many available modules to help control the incoming spam. While spam cannot be completely eliminated, it can be significantly reduced, and what is able to squeeze in through the automated controls, is easily dealt with by the administrator.

Project Leader

Sung Hwan Kim
professorplumpi blog

Project Contributor(s)

Project Details

Originally I had thought to keep Trac, and simply upgrade any necessary components to implement Trac spam filtering modules. However, after being informed of the current version of the system, it seems it would be equal effort begin from scratch. In light of this BugZilla seems to be the better choice; having been originally developed and used by the Mozilla Project. Also, it is currently employed by " Mozilla Foundation, Wikimedia Foundation, WebKit, NASA, Yahoo!, GNOME, KDE, Apache, Red Hat and Novell" (Wikipedia). This avenue may prove to be more robust in the future as it will lend to better performance and scalability. Trac on the other hand is currently deploying version 1.0 as the stable release, the previous version (and installed currently as the bug tracker for Pidora) is version 0.12.


Project Plan

Tracking

While there isn't much version control needed, I may use git to keep changes to configuration files as I work on them.

Key contacts

Andrew Oatly-Willis

Goals by Release

Goals for each release and plans for reaching those goals:

  • 0.1
    • Decide between BugZilla(currently the leader), and Trac.
    • Install chosen application and any necessary spam filtering modules on a local machine/drive.
    • Test installation against spam (possibly use cases already in Pidora bug tracker).
  • 0.2
    • Implement application (and modules) on Production environment.
  • 0.3
    • Make any necessary changes to enhance performance.

Communication

Mailing Lists

Upsteam Wiki and Web

Links/Bugs/Tracking

Source Code Control

Blogs

Non-Seneca Participants

Planets

Project News

After much testing on virtual machines, I have successfully installed Bugzilla on the production server expected to host this service. I have tried to match the current bug tracking system on Trac, interface wise, so current users should not notice too much different in using it.

I will now be attempting to customize the site, and hopefully get the Pidora logo to show up on the front page. I am by no means a web developer, and my limited perl skills have been sitting on a shelf for well over a year. Wish me luck!