Difference between revisions of "Programming Course Content 20111"
(→C) |
(→C) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
** variadic macros | ** variadic macros | ||
** gets() deprecated | ** gets() deprecated | ||
| − | * [http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf | + | * [http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf C11] has been published and approved |
** support international programming, minimize incompatibilities | ** support international programming, minimize incompatibilities | ||
** improved Unicode support | ** improved Unicode support | ||
** multi-threading | ** multi-threading | ||
** _Generic keyword | ** _Generic keyword | ||
| − | |||
** ''to be completed'' | ** ''to be completed'' | ||
| − | |||
** as of Visual Studio 2010 Microsoft had no plans to support C99 | ** as of Visual Studio 2010 Microsoft had no plans to support C99 | ||
| + | * shouldn't we start to teach C11? | ||
| + | <br /> | ||
== C++ == | == C++ == | ||
* the standard that we teach is a mixture of pre-standard C++ and C++98 | * the standard that we teach is a mixture of pre-standard C++ and C++98 | ||
| − | ** C and function style casts | + | ** C and function style casts were deprecated in C++98 |
| − | * C++ | + | * [http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3242.pdf C++11] has been approved and published |
| − | * shouldn't we remove our dependencies on pre-standard C++ | + | * shouldn't we remove our dependencies on pre-standard C++? |
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| + | |||
== Java == | == Java == | ||
We are teaching Java at 1.4 level | We are teaching Java at 1.4 level | ||
| Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
= Professional Options = | = Professional Options = | ||
* what are the minimum requirements for professional options ? | * what are the minimum requirements for professional options ? | ||
| − | * are those requirements being met ? | + | * are those requirements being met by our core courses? |
== Game Programming == | == Game Programming == | ||
* GAM666/DPS901 brings together programming and systems for the first time | * GAM666/DPS901 brings together programming and systems for the first time | ||
Latest revision as of 20:23, 22 February 2012
Programming Stream | Market Demand | Course Content | Work in Progress | Members | Issues
Contents
Languages
Keeping up with the language standards
C
- the standard that we currently teach in our C courses is C89
- C99 introduced several new features and deprecated several features
- //
- long long
- variable length arrays
- inline functions
- variadic macros
- gets() deprecated
- C11 has been published and approved
- support international programming, minimize incompatibilities
- improved Unicode support
- multi-threading
- _Generic keyword
- to be completed
- as of Visual Studio 2010 Microsoft had no plans to support C99
- shouldn't we start to teach C11?
C++
- the standard that we teach is a mixture of pre-standard C++ and C++98
- C and function style casts were deprecated in C++98
- C++11 has been approved and published
- shouldn't we remove our dependencies on pre-standard C++?
Java
We are teaching Java at 1.4 level
- Must include Generics & Annotations
Professional Options
- what are the minimum requirements for professional options ?
- are those requirements being met by our core courses?
Game Programming
- GAM666/DPS901 brings together programming and systems for the first time
- should enrollment in the introductory course be capped
- should CPD students be given the option to take introductory game programming (faculty == yes)
- top CPD students who enroll often do well in this course
- should workshops be added to these courses
- should we issue game programming certificates
Open Source
- what are the minimum requirements for open source students ?
- are those requirements being met ?
Software Support
C and C++ Courses
- nled
- Borland - should we remove this compiler from our course notes
- Visual Studio 2010
- GNU gcc, g++
