Difference between revisions of "Programming Stream Employability"
(→Solutions) |
(→Problem Description) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* our top students fail interview tests due to | * our top students fail interview tests due to | ||
** lack of theoretical knowledge | ** lack of theoretical knowledge | ||
| + | * our students don't market themselves | ||
| + | ** some are bright, hard-working but hide from the public spotlight | ||
* C++ projects no longer accepted - too difficult for our students | * C++ projects no longer accepted - too difficult for our students | ||
* yet some GP students have shown the ability to excel well beyond reasonable expectations | * yet some GP students have shown the ability to excel well beyond reasonable expectations | ||
| + | <br /> | ||
= Suggestions = | = Suggestions = | ||
Latest revision as of 09:40, 7 January 2011
Programming Stream | Market Demand | Course Content | Work in Progress | Members | Issues
Problem Description
- our top students fail interview tests due to
- lack of theoretical knowledge
- our students don't market themselves
- some are bright, hard-working but hide from the public spotlight
- C++ projects no longer accepted - too difficult for our students
- yet some GP students have shown the ability to excel well beyond reasonable expectations
Suggestions
- the long march
- focus on concepts throughout our courses
- Jordan identified the teaching of concepts as critical
- Cathy suggested stressing concepts in lower semester courses
- identify concepts for what they are when we expose students to them
- unit testing
- implementation
- Jordan is known for doing this in his courses
- Chris continues to add conceptual material in his notes
