Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 dacallow"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Hardware Info)
(→‎Results)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 85: Line 85:
 
=== Minefield Build ===
 
=== Minefield Build ===
  
−
*Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre
+
*Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100916 Firefox/4.0b7pre
  
 
=== Chromium Build ===
 
=== Chromium Build ===
  
−
*Chromium 7.0.525.0 (59405)
+
*7.0.528.0 (Developer Build 59770)
−
 
 
  
 
=== Results ===
 
=== Results ===
−
 
−
[http://www.megaupload.com/?d=S4I3GQCR Perfmon Results]
 
  
 
<table border='1' cellpadding='5' cellspacing='0'>
 
<table border='1' cellpadding='5' cellspacing='0'>
Line 108: Line 105:
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>71</td>
+
       <td>91</td>
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/browser-pong/ Browser Pong]</td>
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/water-type/ Water Type]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Not much to be said of speed. Both browsers seemed to be identical</td>
+
       <td>Speeds seems compairable to Chrome</td>
−
       <td>A little jerky on window redraw when moving "paddle" compared to Chromium</td>
+
       <td>Small pause during beginning when waves are first spreading out, less noticable in Chrome.  Noticable pause after a moment if you click down mouse to make waves and slide it around in smooth lines..  likely related to garbage collection.</td>
−
       <td>Both very responsive, utilized same processor amount (4.6% on Minefield, 5.8% on Chromium)</td>
+
       <td>Equal to Chrome</td>
−
       <td>"Ball" window rendered considerably taller in Chromium. Closing parent window orphans paddle and ball windows, they remain dead (but interactivable) on screen</td>
+
       <td>Not sure which is better, but Chrome looks more blurry / maybe anti aliased, then firefox.  Bug observed in both browsers- creating waves across the bottom edge will sometimes leave a persisting vertical glowing bar.</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>72</td>  
+
       <td>92</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/2d-cloth-simulation/ 2D Cloth Simulation]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/tunnelers/ Tunnelers]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Fairly fluid drawing on both Minefield and Chromium. Can slow on Minefield if draw trackers (dots) are added while curtain is in high state of flux</td>  
+
       <td>Equal to Chrome</td>
−
       <td>Smooth</td>  
+
       <td>Equal to Chrome</td>
−
       <td>Minefield was a little slow to pick up on mouse clicks</td>
+
       <td>Equal to Chrome</td>
−
       <td>Processor utilization same on both (avg Minefield was 34%, avg Chromium was 37%). Chromiummuch lighter on memory</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>73</td>  
+
       <td>93</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/animated-harmonograph/ Animated Harmonograph]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/cheloniidae-live/ Cheloniidae Live]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Drawing of complex patterns on Minefield would sometimes cause centre to "wobble"</td>  
+
       <td>Won't run on my build.</td>
−
       <td>Redraw very slow on Minefield, sub-16 FPS. Chromium very fast and smooth.</td>  
+
       <td>Won't run on my build.</td>
−
       <td>Both slow to pick up on mouse clicks, Firefox slightly slower</td>  
+
       <td>Won't run on my build.</td>
−
       <td>Minefield slowly leaked memory (8MB over 10 minutes), CPU was pegged at 100% (Chromium's avg was 86%)</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>74</td>  
+
       <td>94</td>
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/jscanvasbike/ jsCanvasBike]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/plane-deformations/ Plane Deformations]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>No difference found</td>  
+
       <td>At home running must faster in Mindfield, 50 fps (25 in Chrome).  At school Mindfield is slower, 12fps vs Chrome at 20fps.</td>
−
       <td>Minefield seemed a little less smooth when the bike suddenly changed speed. Smoothness generally went down as prolonged periods of speed went up.</td><td>Movements responded well to input. CPU pegged during long periods user input (such as holding down keys to accelerate or balance on one wheel)</td>  
+
       <td>Very smooth</td>
−
       <td>Minefield guzzled 160MB of memory over 4 minutes of constant driving, Chromium's would remain constant with short, periodic spikes.</td>  
+
      <td>Highly responsive. At home movement seems delayed in Chrome but not Firefox</td>
 +
       <td>Not sure which is better, but Chrome looks a bit more blurry then firefox.</td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>75</td>  
+
       <td>95</td>
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/venetianization/ Venetianization]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/plasmatree/ PlasmaTree]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>No problems.</td>  
+
       <td>Same speeds.</td>
−
       <td>No problems.</td>  
+
       <td>Same speeds.</td>
−
       <td>N/A</td>  
+
       <td>Equally responsive</td>
−
       <td>10% higher on processor in Minefield than in Chromium(73.496% avg compared to 60% avg), with much more resources (140 MB compared to 80 MB)</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>76</td>  
+
       <td>96</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/catch-it/ Catch It!]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/crashhaus/ Crashhaus]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Very quick on Firefox, great fun!</td>  
+
       <td>Running faster in Firefox</td>
−
       <td>Smooth redraw, felt like PC game</td>  
+
       <td>Seems to be the same</td>
−
       <td>Very responsive</td>  
+
       <td>n/a</td>
−
       <td>Sluggish and near-unplayable in Chromium. Less CPU in Minefield (4-12%, compared to 9-15% in Chromium) but more memory usage.</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>77</td>  
+
       <td>97</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/liquid-particles/ Liquid Particles]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/trail/ Trail]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>16/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Occasionally Minefield would not render more than 4 particle dots (should be around 100).</td>  
+
       <td>Faster in Firefox</td>
−
       <td>Very choppy on Minefield when drawing both particles and the letters version</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Sometimes unresponsive for up to a second due to high CPU usage</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Incredibly CPU intensive. Perfmon shows CPU usage as 600% at some points. Chromium and Minefieldboth ran letters version choppy (Minefield slightly more so), though Chromium could handle particle version very well</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>78</td>  
+
       <td>98</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/harmony/ Harmony]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/graphycalc/ GraphyCalc]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>16/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Very smooth rendering</td>  
+
       <td>Runs the same</td>
−
       <td>The Graphics were very smooth.</td>  
+
       <td>Runs the same</td>
−
       <td>Very responsive during normal drawing. CPU spike when converting drawing to a PNG image</td>  
+
       <td>Runs the same</td>
−
       <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran this well. Chromium used much more CPU on average than Minefield</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>79</td>    
+
       <td>99</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/realtime-video-ascii-conversion/ Realtime Video->ASCII Conversion]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/magnetic/ Magnetic]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>16/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Rendering was great for both, ASCII characters don't take much to draw</td>  
+
       <td>Tiny pause during initial load. Same speeds after load.</td>
−
       <td>Has harder time converting at higher "resolutions" (ASCII character size decreases) than at higher scales (larger canvas)</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Became quite unresponsive over time, especially at higher resolutions and scales</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Chromium handled higher resolutions noticeably better than Minefield, though Minefield handled higher scales slightly better than Chromium.</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
       <td>80</td>    
+
       <td>100</td>  
−
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/internet-graffiti-board/ Internet Graffiti Board]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/flowerpower/ FlowerPower]</td>
−
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:SWeerdenburg Steven Weerdenburg]</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:dacallow Kaitlyn Callow]</td>
−
       <td>16/09/2010</td>  
+
       <td>17/09/2010</td>
−
       <td>Quick on both</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Smooth</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Input was very responsive.</td>  
+
       <td>Same</td>
−
       <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran this test very well. Both had a bug in that it was possible to mess up the "drag and drop" functionality of the sketch pad: likely a programming error and how the onMouseOver, onMouseDrag and onMouseOut events are handled.</td>  
+
       <td></td>
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>

Latest revision as of 11:51, 21 September 2010

Test Results (Kaitlyn Callow)

Go back to lab page

Hardware Info

Adapter Description ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series
Vendor ID 1002
Device ID 68b8
Adapter RAM 1024
Adapter Drivers aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx32 aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64
Driver Version 8.741.0.0
Driver Date 5-27-2010
Direct2D Enabled true
DirectWrite Enabled true
GPU Accelerated Windows 1/1 Direct3D 9

Minefield Build

  • Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100916 Firefox/4.0b7pre

Chromium Build

  • 7.0.528.0 (Developer Build 59770)

Results

Test No. Test Name Tester Date Firefox Performance - Speed Firefox Performance - Smoothness Firefox Performance - Responsiveness Notes and other Details
91 Water Type Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Speeds seems compairable to Chrome Small pause during beginning when waves are first spreading out, less noticable in Chrome. Noticable pause after a moment if you click down mouse to make waves and slide it around in smooth lines.. likely related to garbage collection. Equal to Chrome Not sure which is better, but Chrome looks more blurry / maybe anti aliased, then firefox. Bug observed in both browsers- creating waves across the bottom edge will sometimes leave a persisting vertical glowing bar.
92 Tunnelers Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Equal to Chrome Equal to Chrome Equal to Chrome
93 Cheloniidae Live Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Won't run on my build. Won't run on my build. Won't run on my build.
94 Plane Deformations Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 At home running must faster in Mindfield, 50 fps (25 in Chrome). At school Mindfield is slower, 12fps vs Chrome at 20fps. Very smooth Highly responsive. At home movement seems delayed in Chrome but not Firefox Not sure which is better, but Chrome looks a bit more blurry then firefox.
95 PlasmaTree Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Same speeds. Same speeds. Equally responsive
96 Crashhaus Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Running faster in Firefox Seems to be the same n/a
97 Trail Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Faster in Firefox Same Same
98 GraphyCalc Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Runs the same Runs the same Runs the same
99 Magnetic Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Tiny pause during initial load. Same speeds after load. Same Same
100 FlowerPower Kaitlyn Callow 17/09/2010 Same Same Same
Retrieved from "https://wiki.cdot.senecapolytechnic.ca/w/index.php?title=Firefox_Performance_Testing_Lab_Fall_2010_dacallow&oldid=45317"