Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 sbologna"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===Firefox Information=== | ||
| + | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Chromium Information=== | ||
| + | Version 7.0.526.0 (59515) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Graphics=== | ||
| + | Adapter Description: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT <br/> | ||
| + | Vendor ID: 10de<br/> | ||
| + | Device ID: 0611<br/> | ||
| + | Adapter RAM: 512<br/> | ||
| + | Adapter Drivers: nvd3dum nvwgf2um<br/> | ||
| + | Driver Version: 7.15.11.7545<br/> | ||
| + | Driver Date: 8-22-2008<br/> | ||
| + | Direct2D Enabled: false<br/> | ||
| + | DirectWrite Enabled: false<br/> | ||
| + | GPU Accelerated Windows: 2/2 Direct3D 9<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
===Test Notes=== | ===Test Notes=== | ||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" | ||
| − | !Name & URL !! Tester !! Date !! Firefox Performance - Speed !! Firefox Performance - Smoothness !! Firefox Performance - Responsiveness !! Notes and other Details | + | !Test Number !! Name & URL !! Tester !! Date !! Firefox Performance - Speed !! Firefox Performance - Smoothness !! Firefox Performance - Responsiveness !! Notes and other Details |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |31 | + | |31 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-3d-engine/ Canvas 3d Engine] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Speed was very good, same as Chromium | || Speed was very good, same as Chromium | ||
|| Firefox was able to rotate the flat 2d images noticeably better than Chromium | || Firefox was able to rotate the flat 2d images noticeably better than Chromium | ||
| Line 9: | Line 29: | ||
|| Overall, Firefox definitely outperformed Chromium here. | || Overall, Firefox definitely outperformed Chromium here. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |32 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/lorenz-84/ Lorenz 84] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |32 |
| − | + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/lorenz-84/ Lorenz 84] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | |
|| - | || - | ||
|| - | || - | ||
|| - | || - | ||
| + | || Did not work in Minefield. Took several seconds to load which caused all other instances of Minefield to hang. When it did load, all attempts to interact with the test caused Minefield to hang again in exactly the same way. Chromium ran it fine. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |33 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/apophis-2029// Apophis 2029] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |33 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/apophis-2029// Apophis 2029] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| The foreground effects were noticeably slower in Firefox | || The foreground effects were noticeably slower in Firefox | ||
|| Both browsers were about the same | || Both browsers were about the same | ||
| Line 21: | Line 43: | ||
|| This one was noticeably faster in Chromium | || This one was noticeably faster in Chromium | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |34 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/bing-bong/ Bing-Bong!] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |34 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/bing-bong/ Bing-Bong!] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Very fast | || Very fast | ||
|| Very smooth | || Very smooth | ||
| Line 27: | Line 50: | ||
|| Both browsers performed equally well | || Both browsers performed equally well | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |35 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/juicydrop-liu5nh/ JuicyDrop] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |35 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/juicydrop-liu5nh/ JuicyDrop] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Very fast | || Very fast | ||
|| Very smooth | || Very smooth | ||
| Line 33: | Line 57: | ||
|| One of the visualization effects didn't work quite right in Chromium (and it REALLY stood out). Firefox on the other hand handled all of them without any trouble. Other than that, both browsers had equally high speed, smoothness and responsiveness. Because of the issue with visualization, I would give this one to Firefox | || One of the visualization effects didn't work quite right in Chromium (and it REALLY stood out). Firefox on the other hand handled all of them without any trouble. Other than that, both browsers had equally high speed, smoothness and responsiveness. Because of the issue with visualization, I would give this one to Firefox | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |36 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/hascanvas/ HasCanvas] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |36 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/hascanvas/ HasCanvas] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Chromium was faster | || Chromium was faster | ||
|| Both browsers were the same | || Both browsers were the same | ||
| Line 39: | Line 64: | ||
|| There was some start up lag in both browsers. This was more noticeable on Chromium. Still, Chromium outperformed Minefield | || There was some start up lag in both browsers. This was more noticeable on Chromium. Still, Chromium outperformed Minefield | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |37 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-sketch/ Canvas Sketch] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |37 |
| − | || | + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-sketch/ Canvas Sketch] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 |
| − | || | + | || Both browsers were the same |
| − | || | + | || Both browsers were the same |
| − | || | + | || 'Clicking Rampages' caused Minefield to slow slightly. This did not happen in Chromium |
| + | || The slowdowns mentioned in responsiveness was the only issue I could find in either browser. Chromium just narrowly outperformed Minefield | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |38 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/world-of-solitaire/ World of Solitaire] || [[User:sbologna|Stpehen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |38 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/world-of-solitaire/ World of Solitaire] || [[User:sbologna|Stpehen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Chromium was slightly better | || Chromium was slightly better | ||
|| Both browsers were the same | || Both browsers were the same | ||
| Line 51: | Line 78: | ||
|| There was an in-game option to adjust the speed. Using this option, Chromium displayed a more varied difference between its top speed and its lowest speed. Chromium outperformed Minefield | || There was an in-game option to adjust the speed. Using this option, Chromium displayed a more varied difference between its top speed and its lowest speed. Chromium outperformed Minefield | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |39 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/google-sphere/ Google Sphere] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |39 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/google-sphere/ Google Sphere] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Chromium was much faster | || Chromium was much faster | ||
|| Both browsers were the same | || Both browsers were the same | ||
| Line 57: | Line 85: | ||
|| Minefield's presentation looked much sloppier than Chromium. In Minefield, as the text got closer to the screen and grew larger, it also appeared to become 'bold' and less legible. Chromium very much outperformed Minefield here | || Minefield's presentation looked much sloppier than Chromium. In Minefield, as the text got closer to the screen and grew larger, it also appeared to become 'bold' and less legible. Chromium very much outperformed Minefield here | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |40 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/js-fireworks/ JS Fireworks] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | + | |40 |
| + | || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/js-fireworks/ JS Fireworks] || [[User:sbologna|Stephen Bologna]] || Sept 15 2010 | ||
|| Very fast | || Very fast | ||
|| There was a small amount of lag in the first second or two when the visualizations started in Firefox. Once things got going however, both browsers were very smooth | || There was a small amount of lag in the first second or two when the visualizations started in Firefox. Once things got going however, both browsers were very smooth | ||
Latest revision as of 13:50, 17 September 2010
Firefox Information
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre
Chromium Information
Version 7.0.526.0 (59515)
Graphics
Adapter Description: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT
Vendor ID: 10de
Device ID: 0611
Adapter RAM: 512
Adapter Drivers: nvd3dum nvwgf2um
Driver Version: 7.15.11.7545
Driver Date: 8-22-2008
Direct2D Enabled: false
DirectWrite Enabled: false
GPU Accelerated Windows: 2/2 Direct3D 9
Test Notes
| Test Number | Name & URL | Tester | Date | Firefox Performance - Speed | Firefox Performance - Smoothness | Firefox Performance - Responsiveness | Notes and other Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | Canvas 3d Engine | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Speed was very good, same as Chromium | Firefox was able to rotate the flat 2d images noticeably better than Chromium | 'Clicking Rampages' were handled about the same in each browser. In each case, there was a slight lag when the rampage began, but it caught up quickly | Overall, Firefox definitely outperformed Chromium here. |
| 32 | Lorenz 84 | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | - | - | - | Did not work in Minefield. Took several seconds to load which caused all other instances of Minefield to hang. When it did load, all attempts to interact with the test caused Minefield to hang again in exactly the same way. Chromium ran it fine. |
| 33 | Apophis 2029 | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | The foreground effects were noticeably slower in Firefox | Both browsers were about the same | Controls felt slightly more sluggish in Firefox | This one was noticeably faster in Chromium |
| 34 | Bing-Bong! | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Very fast | Very smooth | Very responsive | Both browsers performed equally well |
| 35 | JuicyDrop | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Very fast | Very smooth | Very responsive | One of the visualization effects didn't work quite right in Chromium (and it REALLY stood out). Firefox on the other hand handled all of them without any trouble. Other than that, both browsers had equally high speed, smoothness and responsiveness. Because of the issue with visualization, I would give this one to Firefox |
| 36 | HasCanvas | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Chromium was faster | Both browsers were the same | Both browsers were the same | There was some start up lag in both browsers. This was more noticeable on Chromium. Still, Chromium outperformed Minefield |
| 37 | Canvas Sketch | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Both browsers were the same | Both browsers were the same | 'Clicking Rampages' caused Minefield to slow slightly. This did not happen in Chromium | The slowdowns mentioned in responsiveness was the only issue I could find in either browser. Chromium just narrowly outperformed Minefield |
| 38 | World of Solitaire | Stpehen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Chromium was slightly better | Both browsers were the same | Chromium was slightly better | There was an in-game option to adjust the speed. Using this option, Chromium displayed a more varied difference between its top speed and its lowest speed. Chromium outperformed Minefield |
| 39 | Google Sphere | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Chromium was much faster | Both browsers were the same | Both browsers were the same | Minefield's presentation looked much sloppier than Chromium. In Minefield, as the text got closer to the screen and grew larger, it also appeared to become 'bold' and less legible. Chromium very much outperformed Minefield here |
| 40 | JS Fireworks | Stephen Bologna | Sept 15 2010 | Very fast | There was a small amount of lag in the first second or two when the visualizations started in Firefox. Once things got going however, both browsers were very smooth | Very responsive | Both browsers performed equally well |