Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 blaw1"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Results)
(→‎Results)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 103: Line 103:
 
       <th>Firefox Performance - Responsiveness</th>
 
       <th>Firefox Performance - Responsiveness</th>
 
       <th>Notes and other Details</th>
 
       <th>Notes and other Details</th>
−
   <tr>
+
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
       <td>61</td>
 
       <td>61</td>
 
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/3d-waveform 3D Waveform]</td>
 
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/3d-waveform 3D Waveform]</td>
−
       <td>Brian Law</td>
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>
 
       <td>Used about 50% of my CPU power.</td>
 
       <td>Used about 50% of my CPU power.</td>
 
       <td>It didn't run smoothly at all, very choppy.</td>
 
       <td>It didn't run smoothly at all, very choppy.</td>
 
       <td>Followed mouse movements well.</td>
 
       <td>Followed mouse movements well.</td>
−
       <td>This test ran a bit smoother on Chromium, and used roughly 40% CPU power.</td>
+
       <td>This test runs a bit smoother on Chromium, and used roughly 40% CPU power.</td>
 +
  </tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
−
  <tr>
+
       <td>62</td>  
−
      <!-- Test No. -->
 
−
       <td>62</td>  
 
−
      <!-- Test Name -->   
 
 
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td>  
 
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td>  
−
      <!-- Tester --> 
+
       <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>  
−
       <td>Brian Law</td>  
 
−
      <!-- Date -->   
 
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Speed-->
 
 
       <td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>  
 
       <td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>  
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness-->
 
 
       <td>It stutters a lot.</td>  
 
       <td>It stutters a lot.</td>  
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness-->
 
 
       <td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>  
 
       <td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>  
−
      <!-- Notes and other Details -->   
 
 
       <td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td>   
 
       <td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td>   
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
−
<tr>
+
  <tr>
−
       <!-- Test No. -->  
+
       <td>63</td> 
−
       <td></td>  
+
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/waterfall/ WaterFall]</td>
−
       <!-- Test Name -->    
+
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
−
       <td></td>  
+
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
−
       <!-- Tester -->   
+
      <td>Slowed down over time</td>
−
       <td>Brian Law</td>  
+
      <td>Only the first 10 seconds was smooth.</td>
−
       <!-- Date -->     
+
      <td>N/A</td>
 +
      <td>Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>64</td>   
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/another-world-js/ Another World JS]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>Ran well, no issues.</td>
 +
      <td>Ran smoothly as well.</td>
 +
      <td>Movements responded well to input.</td>
 +
      <td>This is test run at about 10 FPS higher on Minefield than on Chromium.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>65</td>   
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/gear/ Gear]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>No problems.</td>
 +
      <td>Extremely choppy when performing actions</td>
 +
      <td>Was not responsive. Had a lot of lag when moving the mouse over the gears.</td>
 +
      <td>Ran smoother in Chromium, although it also had lag issues.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>66</td> 
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/graph-layout/ Graph Layout]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>This test would not launch.</td>
 +
      <td>N/A</td>
 +
      <td>N/A</td>
 +
      <td>This test ran very well in Chromium, it was fast and responsive.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>67</td> 
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/scroll-clock/ Scroll Clock]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>Slight lag</td>
 +
      <td>Noticeably choppy</td>
 +
      <td>N/A</td>
 +
      <td>Ran smoother in Chromium</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
       <td>68</td>  
 +
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/crystal-galaxy/ Crystal Galaxy]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>This game ran very well, no lag issues.</td>
 +
      <td>The Graphics were very smooth.</td>  
 +
       <td>Input was very responsive.</td>  
 +
       <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran the game well.</td>   
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>69</td>   
 +
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/aquarium/ Aquarium]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>Slight lag.</td>
 +
      <td>It was choppy every couple seconds for only a couple ms.</td>  
 +
       <td>Was a bit unresponsive due to lag.</td>
 +
      <td>Chromium seemed to have taken up more CPU resources but still performed a little better.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
      <td>70</td>     
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/sketchpad/ Sketchpad]</td>
 +
      <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Speed-->
+
       <td>Ran very fast.</td>  
−
       <td></td>
+
       <td>N/A</td>  
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness-->
+
       <td>Input was very responsive.</td>  
−
       <td></td>
+
       <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran this test very well.</td>   
−
      <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness-->
 
−
       <td></td>  
 
−
      <!-- Notes and other Details -->   
 
−
       <td></td>   
 
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
−
<table>
+
</table>

Latest revision as of 14:45, 15 September 2010

Test Results (Brian Law)

Go back to lab page

Hardware Info

Adapter Description NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Vendor ID 10de
Device ID 0605
Adapter RAM 512
Adapter Drivers nvd3dum nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver Version 8.17.11.9621
Driver Date 1-11-2010
Direct2D Enabled true
DirectWrite Enabled true
GPU Accelerated Windows 1/1 Direct3D 9

Minefield Build

  • Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre

Chromium Build

  • Chromium 7.0.525.0 (59494)


Results

Test No. Test Name Tester Date Firefox Performance - Speed Firefox Performance - Smoothness Firefox Performance - Responsiveness Notes and other Details
61 3D Waveform Brian Law 15/09/2010 Used about 50% of my CPU power. It didn't run smoothly at all, very choppy. Followed mouse movements well. This test runs a bit smoother on Chromium, and used roughly 40% CPU power.
62 Rotten Brian Law 15/09/2010 Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%. It stutters a lot. Is decently responsive to mouse clicks. This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother
63 WaterFall Brian Law 15/09/2010 Slowed down over time Only the first 10 seconds was smooth. N/A Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.
64 Another World JS Brian Law 15/09/2010 Ran well, no issues. Ran smoothly as well. Movements responded well to input. This is test run at about 10 FPS higher on Minefield than on Chromium.
65 Gear Brian Law 15/09/2010 No problems. Extremely choppy when performing actions Was not responsive. Had a lot of lag when moving the mouse over the gears. Ran smoother in Chromium, although it also had lag issues.
66 Graph Layout Brian Law 15/09/2010 This test would not launch. N/A N/A This test ran very well in Chromium, it was fast and responsive.
67 Scroll Clock Brian Law 15/09/2010 Slight lag Noticeably choppy N/A Ran smoother in Chromium
68 Crystal Galaxy Brian Law 15/09/2010 This game ran very well, no lag issues. The Graphics were very smooth. Input was very responsive. Both Minefield and Chromium ran the game well.
69 Aquarium Brian Law 15/09/2010 Slight lag. It was choppy every couple seconds for only a couple ms. Was a bit unresponsive due to lag. Chromium seemed to have taken up more CPU resources but still performed a little better.
70 Sketchpad Brian Law 15/09/2010 Ran very fast. N/A Input was very responsive. Both Minefield and Chromium ran this test very well.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.cdot.senecapolytechnic.ca/w/index.php?title=Firefox_Performance_Testing_Lab_Fall_2010_blaw1&oldid=44610"