Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 cwdesautels"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with ' ==Test Results (cwdesautels)== '''Go back to lab page''' === Hardware Info === *Adapter Description: *Vendor ID: *Device ID: *…')
 
(→‎Chromium Build Info)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
=== Hardware Info ===
 
=== Hardware Info ===
−
*Adapter Description:
+
*Adapter Description: GeForce GTX 480
−
*Vendor ID:
+
*Vendor ID: ?
−
*Device ID:
+
*Device ID: ?
−
*Adapter RAM:
+
*Adapter RAM: 1536
−
*Adapter Drivers:
+
*Adapter Drivers: Nvidia Corporation
−
*Driver Version:
+
*Driver Version: 8.17.12.5896
−
*Driver Date:
+
*Driver Date: 7/9/2010
−
*Direct2D Enabled:
+
*Direct2D Enabled: Yes
−
*DirectWrite Enabled:
+
*DirectWrite Enabled: Yes
−
*GPU Accelerated Windows:
+
*GPU Accelerated Windows: Yes
−
 
 
  
 
=== Firefox Build Info ===
 
=== Firefox Build Info ===
−
 
+
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100916 Firefox/4.0b7pre
  
 
===Chromium Build Info===
 
===Chromium Build Info===
−
 
+
7.0.528.0 (Developer Build 59753)
  
 
===Test Notes===
 
===Test Notes===
Line 28: Line 27:
 
!Name & URL !! Tester !! Date !!  Firefox Performance - Speed !! Firefox Performance - Smoothness !! Firefox Performance - Responsiveness !! Notes and other Details
 
!Name & URL !! Tester !! Date !!  Firefox Performance - Speed !! Firefox Performance - Smoothness !! Firefox Performance - Responsiveness !! Notes and other Details
 
|-
 
|-
−
|111  [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/noise-field Noise Field] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/boom-box/ Boom-Box] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || n/a || n/a || n/a || Experiment never loaded
−
 
 
−
|| Does not seem to be choppy or have any lag || Graphics rendered smoothly but, the shapes leave permanent dark trails behind them that stand out from the background || Other Minefield windows are responsive|| The animations of the shapes in chrome seemed to slow significantly when the window was not the focus of the mouse pointer, but it was not a problem in minefield.
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
|112 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/keylight/ Keylight] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010 || Begins to slowdown and skip when lot of dots are placed on the screen. (happens in chrome too) || all the objects are rendered with the same quality as in Chrome || no noticeable difference in other windows response time. || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/chromedrones/ ChromeDrones] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || Choppy when creating notes || Extremely choppy when creating new notes (gets really bad 8+) || Fast Response times || Chrome is choppy during creation. However the breakpoint came far quicker in firefox
 
|-
 
|-
−
|113 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/breathing-galaxies/ Breathing Galaxies] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010 || I did not see any trouble with the speed of the animations. || Minefield had no trouble animating the shapes || No slowdown in response time in other windows. || identical performance, from what i observed.
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/balldroppings/ BallDropping] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || slower then Chrome during 'idle' || Speed variance really showed itself during max ball drop speed, Chrome maintained more smoothness || Very || Chrome balls seem to bounce faster during all load levels
 
|-
 
|-
−
|114 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/cubescape/ Cubescape] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] ||  Sept 14 2010 || Speed was good. no slowdowns. || the only trouble i noticed was the animations of the blocks shadows as they fell. in chrome it was smooth and matched the location of the block but in minefield the shadow lagged and left marks on screen where it had been. the marks disappear when the block stops bouncing || did not affect other windows response time || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/shop/ Shop] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || equal || very || uneventful experiment
 
|-
 
|-
−
|115 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/sinuous/ Sinuous] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] ||  Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/video-picture-puzzle/ Video & Picture Puzzle] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || Much slower at spitting out the puzzle windows || Very || Very || Chrome was REALLY slow loading and buffering the video puzzle. Firefox hit that out of the park
 
|-
 
|-
−
|116 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/color-piano/ Color Piano] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/homeostasis/ Homeostasis] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || equal || very || extremely uneventful experiment
 
|-
 
|-
−
|117 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/sand-trap/ Sand Trap] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] ||  Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/ball-pool/ Ball Pool] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || Not quite as smooth as chrome with 50-75% ball saturation || very || chrome retained fluidity with far more balls
 
|-
 
|-
−
|118 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/sand-trap/ 3DTin] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canopy/ Canopy] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || equal || very || mesmerizing experiment
 
|-
 
|-
−
|119 [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/plasma/ Plasma] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] || Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/smalltalk/ Smalltalk] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || equal || very || both browsers performed well, not very stressful
 
|-
 
|-
−
|120 [http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/ The Wilderness Downtown] || [[User:cadecairos|Chris]] ||  Sept 14 2010 || - || - || - || -
+
| [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/social-collider/ Social Collider] || Carl || 9/16/2010 || equal || equal || very || Interesting experiment, didn't seem stressful
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 19:02, 19 September 2010


Test Results (cwdesautels)

Go back to lab page

Hardware Info

  • Adapter Description: GeForce GTX 480
  • Vendor ID: ?
  • Device ID: ?
  • Adapter RAM: 1536
  • Adapter Drivers: Nvidia Corporation
  • Driver Version: 8.17.12.5896
  • Driver Date: 7/9/2010
  • Direct2D Enabled: Yes
  • DirectWrite Enabled: Yes
  • GPU Accelerated Windows: Yes

Firefox Build Info

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100916 Firefox/4.0b7pre

Chromium Build Info

7.0.528.0 (Developer Build 59753)

Test Notes

Name & URL Tester Date Firefox Performance - Speed Firefox Performance - Smoothness Firefox Performance - Responsiveness Notes and other Details
Boom-Box Carl 9/16/2010 n/a n/a n/a Experiment never loaded
ChromeDrones Carl 9/16/2010 Choppy when creating notes Extremely choppy when creating new notes (gets really bad 8+) Fast Response times Chrome is choppy during creation. However the breakpoint came far quicker in firefox
BallDropping Carl 9/16/2010 slower then Chrome during 'idle' Speed variance really showed itself during max ball drop speed, Chrome maintained more smoothness Very Chrome balls seem to bounce faster during all load levels
Shop Carl 9/16/2010 equal equal very uneventful experiment
Video & Picture Puzzle Carl 9/16/2010 Much slower at spitting out the puzzle windows Very Very Chrome was REALLY slow loading and buffering the video puzzle. Firefox hit that out of the park
Homeostasis Carl 9/16/2010 equal equal very extremely uneventful experiment
Ball Pool Carl 9/16/2010 equal Not quite as smooth as chrome with 50-75% ball saturation very chrome retained fluidity with far more balls
Canopy Carl 9/16/2010 equal equal very mesmerizing experiment
Smalltalk Carl 9/16/2010 equal equal very both browsers performed well, not very stressful
Social Collider Carl 9/16/2010 equal equal very Interesting experiment, didn't seem stressful
Retrieved from "https://wiki.cdot.senecapolytechnic.ca/w/index.php?title=Firefox_Performance_Testing_Lab_Fall_2010_cwdesautels&oldid=45183"