Difference between revisions of "ICT at S@Y"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
− | I was in Mary Lynn's office voicing concerns about what is happening in our labs and with our content delivery, and how I am hearing of impending changes which I find worrisome. For example, we will no longer use removable hard drives, possibly to be replaced by virtualization over "the cloud". | + | I was in Mary Lynn's office voicing concerns about what is happening in our labs and with our content delivery, and how I am hearing of impending changes which I find worrisome. For example, we will no longer use removable hard drives, possibly to be replaced by '''virtualization''' over "the cloud". |
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Proposal == | == Proposal == | ||
− | I would like to propose that we form some kind of committee that is going to act as a conduit for communicating our needs to ITS. Those of us who teach computer studies courses are well aware that our needs are not the same as those in many other programs, and that solutions which work for other programs often do not work for us. From what I have seen and heard, ITS has some big changes coming down the pipe, and are waiting to implement them here until they have heard our needs. I believe our needs are diverse, unique and often esoteric. I think that if we are to avoid disaster in the fall, we need to carefully collect ourselves and take a close look at what we each need. We must articulate these needs clearly, completely, and constructively (I adore an apt alliteration), in a formal manner, rather than in an ad hoc manner, as we have been doing until now. | + | I would like to propose that we form some kind of committee that is going to act as a conduit for communicating our needs to ITS. Those of us who teach computer studies courses are well aware that our needs are not the same as those in many other programs, and that solutions which work for other programs often do not work for us. From what I have seen and heard, ITS has some big changes coming down the pipe, and are waiting to implement them here until they have heard our needs. I believe our needs are diverse, unique and often esoteric. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I think that if we are to avoid disaster in the fall (or at least "identify and accommodate special situations"), we need to carefully collect ourselves and take a close look at what we each need. We must articulate these needs clearly, completely, and constructively (I adore an apt alliteration), in a formal manner, rather than in an ad hoc manner, as we have been doing until now. | ||
Thanks, I look forward, for the most part, to hearing from you, | Thanks, I look forward, for the most part, to hearing from you, | ||
Mike Martin | Mike Martin |
Revision as of 12:40, 24 March 2013
Requirements for Labs and Classrooms
Background
I was in Mary Lynn's office voicing concerns about what is happening in our labs and with our content delivery, and how I am hearing of impending changes which I find worrisome. For example, we will no longer use removable hard drives, possibly to be replaced by virtualization over "the cloud".
Of further concern is the fact that I am not sure where to voice my concerns in a forum where they will be heard and appropriately acted upon. Mary Lynn informed me that IT Services (ITS) is holding off on making changes to our labs until September. I fear that changes will be implemented during the summer which will render me incapable of delivering my course content in an effective way. It was suggested that the ball is in faculty's court and someone needs to play it. So, I'm taking a swipe.
Proposal
I would like to propose that we form some kind of committee that is going to act as a conduit for communicating our needs to ITS. Those of us who teach computer studies courses are well aware that our needs are not the same as those in many other programs, and that solutions which work for other programs often do not work for us. From what I have seen and heard, ITS has some big changes coming down the pipe, and are waiting to implement them here until they have heard our needs. I believe our needs are diverse, unique and often esoteric.
I think that if we are to avoid disaster in the fall (or at least "identify and accommodate special situations"), we need to carefully collect ourselves and take a close look at what we each need. We must articulate these needs clearly, completely, and constructively (I adore an apt alliteration), in a formal manner, rather than in an ad hoc manner, as we have been doing until now.
Thanks, I look forward, for the most part, to hearing from you,
Mike Martin