Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chris Tyler/OPS235 Updates"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:* I like lab #1 - I think it is very useful. I wanted to make a YouTube video on practical use of skills used in lab #1...<br /><br /> | :* I like lab #1 - I think it is very useful. I wanted to make a YouTube video on practical use of skills used in lab #1...<br /><br /> | ||
| − | :* I'm OK with ditching written test #2<br /><br /> | + | :* I'm OK with ditching written test #2 (but then how does this affect mark weighting?)<br /><br /> |
:* I think it could work if we just took one assignment and split it into 2 sections. I got idea from Chris Jankul when he was teaching OPS435. He had two stages (the second built upon the other). In this way, marking doesn't have to be "massive". I believe that students gain the most experience from performing the labs any-ways... | :* I think it could work if we just took one assignment and split it into 2 sections. I got idea from Chris Jankul when he was teaching OPS435. He had two stages (the second built upon the other). In this way, marking doesn't have to be "massive". I believe that students gain the most experience from performing the labs any-ways... | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 3 January 2012
msaul:
- I like lab #1 - I think it is very useful. I wanted to make a YouTube video on practical use of skills used in lab #1...
- I'm OK with ditching written test #2 (but then how does this affect mark weighting?)
- I think it could work if we just took one assignment and split it into 2 sections. I got idea from Chris Jankul when he was teaching OPS435. He had two stages (the second built upon the other). In this way, marking doesn't have to be "massive". I believe that students gain the most experience from performing the labs any-ways...
- I like lab #1 - I think it is very useful. I wanted to make a YouTube video on practical use of skills used in lab #1...
