Difference between revisions of "Programming Stream"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Questions for Discussion)
(Questions for Discussion)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* do we need to change emphasis on the material covered in these courses
 
* do we need to change emphasis on the material covered in these courses
 
== C Programming ==
 
== C Programming ==
 +
* the standard that we teach in our C courses is C89
 +
* C99 introduced several new features
 +
** //
 +
** long long
 +
** variable length arrays
 +
** inline function
 +
** gets() deprecated
 +
* C1x is under preparation
 +
** support international programming, minimize incompatibilities, projected publication in 2012
 +
** improved Unicode support
 +
** multithreading
 +
** _Generic keyword
 +
* shouldn't we start to teach C99 in preparation for C1x
 
== C++ Programming ==
 
== C++ Programming ==
 +
* the standard that we teach is a mixture of Pre-standard C++ and C++98
 +
** C and function style casts are deprecated in C++98
 +
* C++0x is nearing completion
 +
* shouldn't we remove our dependencies on Pre-standard C++ in preparation for C++0x
 
* should students work with repositories
 
* should students work with repositories
 
* should students work in teams in OOP344, BTP300
 
* should students work in teams in OOP344, BTP300

Revision as of 23:25, 5 January 2011


Programming Stream | Market Demand | Course Content | Work in Progress | Members | Issues


Welcome to the Programming Stream Group at the School of Computer Studies

Feel free to contribute to this wiki and help develop and refine our curriculum further

Overview

  • This wiki describes some of the curriculum developments within the programming stream at the School of Computer Studies
  • A variety of projects are currently active and driven by
    • the general need to produce professional programmers ready to enter the workplace
    • the growing digital game programming industry
    • the growing open source communities for software developers
  • Most of the work reported here has been initiated and is being sustained by faculty
  • Much of the information here is being provided
    • to inform members of the status quo
    • to solicit member comments and criticisms


Questions for Discussion

  • how do we attract the best and the brightest to our program
  • should students be exposed to open source tools early on, if so when
  • do we need to change emphasis on the material covered in these courses

C Programming

  • the standard that we teach in our C courses is C89
  • C99 introduced several new features
    • //
    • long long
    • variable length arrays
    • inline function
    • gets() deprecated
  • C1x is under preparation
    • support international programming, minimize incompatibilities, projected publication in 2012
    • improved Unicode support
    • multithreading
    • _Generic keyword
  • shouldn't we start to teach C99 in preparation for C1x

C++ Programming

  • the standard that we teach is a mixture of Pre-standard C++ and C++98
    • C and function style casts are deprecated in C++98
  • C++0x is nearing completion
  • shouldn't we remove our dependencies on Pre-standard C++ in preparation for C++0x
  • should students work with repositories
  • should students work in teams in OOP344, BTP300

Game Programming

  • what are the minimum requirements for game programming students ?
  • are those requirements being met ?
  • GAM666/DPS901 brings together programming and systems for the first time
  • should enrollment in the introductory course be capped
  • should CPD students be given the option to take introductory game programming
    • top CPD students who enroll often do well in this course
  • should workshops be added to these courses
  • should we issue game programming certificates

Open Source

  • what are the minimum requirements for open source students ?
  • are those requirements being met ?


Deferred Issues