Difference between revisions of "BTH740 Research Essay 20103"
(→Edit) |
(→Presentation/Publication) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** tertiary - summarize | ** tertiary - summarize | ||
* length 1600-2400 words | * length 1600-2400 words | ||
− | |||
* late penalties 20% | * late penalties 20% | ||
* timeline: | * timeline: | ||
Line 173: | Line 172: | ||
** 1st person or third person | ** 1st person or third person | ||
** style | ** style | ||
− | *** MLA | + | *** MLA (see Purdue OWL) |
**** Margins 1" all around excluding page numbers | **** Margins 1" all around excluding page numbers | ||
**** Times New Roman 12 point | **** Times New Roman 12 point | ||
Line 183: | Line 182: | ||
**** citations (Author pageNumber) | **** citations (Author pageNumber) | ||
**** works cited LastName, FirstName. ''Title.'' City:Publisher, Year. | **** works cited LastName, FirstName. ''Title.'' City:Publisher, Year. | ||
− | **** sites cited LastName, FirstName. ''Title.'' City:Publisher, Year. <http://www.xxx.org/xxx/> | + | **** sites cited LastName, FirstName. ''Title.'' City:Publisher, Year. <http://www.xxx.org/xxx/>. Date of Access. |
**** interviews LastName, FirstName. Type of Interview. Date. | **** interviews LastName, FirstName. Type of Interview. Date. | ||
**** list works cited in alphabetical order at the end of the paper starting on a new page | **** list works cited in alphabetical order at the end of the paper starting on a new page | ||
− | *** APA | + | *** APA (see Purdue OWL) |
**** citations (Author, Year, p.PageNumber) | **** citations (Author, Year, p.PageNumber) | ||
**** works cited LastName, FirstName. (Year). ''Title.'' City:Publisher. | **** works cited LastName, FirstName. (Year). ''Title.'' City:Publisher. | ||
− | *** Chicago | + | *** [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html Chicago] |
+ | **** [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html citations and works cited] | ||
*** CBE | *** CBE | ||
+ | **** [http://ctl.utsc.utoronto.ca/twc/sites/default/files/CSE.pdf citations and works cited] | ||
+ | **** [http://www.lib.washington.edu/help/guides/42cbe.pdf citations and works cited] | ||
+ | *** ACM | ||
+ | **** [https://cs.senecac.on.ca/~bth740/pages/assignments/acm.pubform.doc SIG journal articles] | ||
* expression | * expression | ||
** argument flow | ** argument flow | ||
Line 199: | Line 203: | ||
== Presentation/Publication == | == Presentation/Publication == | ||
− | * to be | + | * source: Parberry, Ian (2000) How to Present a Paper in Theoretical Computer Science: A Speaker's Guide for Students, Dept. Comp. Sc., Univ North Texas. Denton, Texas. |
+ | === What to Say How to Say it === | ||
+ | * communicate key ideas | ||
+ | ** emphasize key ideas | ||
+ | ** skip standard, obvious, or complicated | ||
+ | * don't get bogged down in details | ||
+ | ** you have been thinking deeply for months | ||
+ | ** audience has not - is the paper worth reading? | ||
+ | ** details are out of place - leave them in the paper | ||
+ | * structure your talk | ||
+ | ** break into distinct parts | ||
+ | * use a top-down approach | ||
+ | ** introduction | ||
+ | *** informal description - impressions are important | ||
+ | *** define the problem | ||
+ | *** motivate the audience | ||
+ | **** explain why it is so important | ||
+ | *** introduce terminology | ||
+ | *** discuss earlier work | ||
+ | *** emphasize contributions of your paper | ||
+ | **** this may be the only points audience will remember | ||
+ | *** provide a road-map to the talk | ||
+ | ** body | ||
+ | *** abstract the major results or contributions | ||
+ | *** explain the significance of the results | ||
+ | *** sketch a proof of the crucial results | ||
+ | **** gloss over the technical details | ||
+ | ** technicalities | ||
+ | *** present a key result | ||
+ | **** give the flavour of the rest of the technical details in a short period of time | ||
+ | *** present it carefully | ||
+ | **** fill in small gaps | ||
+ | **** mention points that may not be in the paper itself | ||
+ | ** conclusion | ||
+ | *** hindsight is clear than foresight | ||
+ | **** make observation that would have been confusing earlier | ||
+ | **** regain the attention of non-experts in the audience | ||
+ | *** state open problems | ||
+ | **** identify problems that arise from your paper | ||
+ | **** mention weaknesses of your paper | ||
+ | **** indicate that your talk is over | ||
+ | === Delivery - Getting through to your Audience === | ||
+ | * use repetition | ||
+ | ** "tell them what you're going to tell them. Tell them. Tell them what you told them | ||
+ | * remind, don't assume | ||
+ | ** if your paper assumes a standard result, state it as a reminder | ||
+ | * don't over-run | ||
+ | ** conference presentations last 15 to 30 minutes with 5 minutes for questions | ||
+ | ** if short on time, cut the technicalities section | ||
+ | * maintain eye contact | ||
+ | ** spread your attention, don't concentrate on one person | ||
+ | * control your voice | ||
+ | ** avoid fashion, hype, information-free utterances | ||
+ | * control your motion | ||
+ | ** avoid hyperactivity | ||
+ | ** use natural gestures | ||
+ | * take care of your appearance | ||
+ | ** avoid ostentatiousness | ||
+ | * minimize language difficulties | ||
+ | * try not to get anxious | ||
+ | ** prepare adequately beforehand | ||
+ | ** do not pay undue attention to the reaction of the most important person in the audience - their reactions may be the result of something that is totally unrelated to your presentation | ||
+ | ** to calm panic, pause, close your eyes, and take a few deep breaths | ||
+ | ** it is the quality of your research that matters | ||
+ | === Visual and Aural Aids === | ||
+ | * make legible slides | ||
+ | * don't put too much on a slide - remember short-term memory | ||
+ | * don't use too many slide- reserve 2 minutes per slide | ||
+ | * use colour effectively - avoid rainbows - yellow is almost invisible | ||
+ | * pictures and tables | ||
+ | ** pictures are worth a thousand words | ||
+ | === Question Time === | ||
+ | * expect three types of questions | ||
+ | ** genuine request for knowledge | ||
+ | ** selfish - draws attention to the questioner - indirectly compliment them | ||
+ | ** malicious - expect to have your ego bruised - be prepared, be polite, and avoid lengthy exchanges - offer a one-to-one discussion afterwards | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == |
Latest revision as of 11:40, 22 November 2010
BTH740 | Weekly Schedule | Research Projects | Research Essay | Student Resources
Contents
How To Write a Research Essay
Four Stages of Research
- Thesis Statement
- Research
- Writing
- Presentation
Thesis Statement
Requirements For the Final Essay
set by the instructor - what you need to know before starting to prepare the thesis statement
- number of sources
- primary >= 2
- secondary >= 4
- tertiary - summarize
- length 1600-2400 words
- late penalties 20%
- timeline:
- thesis statement - due October 18
- preliminary research - due November 1
- recording details - due November 8
- writing - due November 22
- publication - due November 25
Narrowing the Focus
select the topic
- sources
- encyclopedias
- textbooks
- dictionaries
- videos
- process
- jot down ideas
- discuss ideas
- circle one that are of interest
- select one from a short-list
- select another as the alternative
Searching for Sources
create working bibliography
- questions to answer
- are there sufficient sources
- is each one relevant to the focus
- are the sources diverse
- are the sources quality sources
- are there twice as many sources as required
- process
- read
- abstracts
- conclusions
- reviews
- balance
- books
- articles
- electronic
- audio-visual
- old
- new
- list publication details accurately
- read
Defining the Purpose
- single sentence plus keywords
- discuss the thesis
- discuss with two peers
- refine the focus
- define the scope
- pose the research question
- sufficient sources
- narrow enough topic
- avoid
- bibliographical
- narrative
- descriptive
- unfounded assumptions
- how successful not why successful
- formulate one precise sentence
- task is to answer the question <- sole purpose
- make short list of sub-tasks
- identify keywords
Submission
- thesis statement
- keywords
- bibliography
Research
Preparatory Readings
purpose: rephrase the thesis statement
- develop a fuller understanding of the topic
- read some of the shorter sources
- keep the research question in mind
- rephrase your thesis
Record Research Data
purpose: create the research note record
- maintain a well-balanced variety of source materials
- question what you read and record continuously
- read the prioritized sources carefully and in detail
- analyze and select ideas and data related to your thesis
- record all relevant information as research notes
- for
- against
- review other sources for context, support and opposition
- process
- types of notes
- direct quotations
- personal insights
- paraphrases
- summarizations
- method of documentation
- note
- page number
- source number
- major questions to keep in mind
- does the note pertain to the thesis question
- should I reconsider the focus
- should I broaden the focus
- should I narrow the focus further
- types of notes
Assemble and Prioritize
purpose: create a flowing argument
- assemble the notes into major groups
- arrange the notes within each group in order
- distinguish deductive, inductive, and abductive conclusions
Submission
- edited thesis statement
- prioritized note record
- outline of the argument
Writing
Outline
purpose: organize the flow
- structure
- introduction
- body
- arguments
- conclusion
- process
- retain results that pertain to the thesis
- create a skeleton
- use point form
Rough Draft
purpose: compose the argument in ascending order of importance/interest
- preface
- title
- abstract
- keywords
- introduction
- context
- purpose
- interpretations
- thesis statement
- body
- each point is one paragraph
- conclusion
- sum up supporting points
- no new information
- one to three paragraphs
- references
- works cited
Edit
purpose: create final draft
- check instructor's requirements
- format
- layout
- 1st person or third person
- style
- MLA (see Purdue OWL)
- Margins 1" all around excluding page numbers
- Times New Roman 12 point
- no justification, no hyphenation, double space, two spaces after a period
- no title page for a research paper
- sentence case your title no bold no period
- page numbering in upper right hand corner preceded by your last name
- secure your pages with a paper clip no plastic folders
- citations (Author pageNumber)
- works cited LastName, FirstName. Title. City:Publisher, Year.
- sites cited LastName, FirstName. Title. City:Publisher, Year. <http://www.xxx.org/xxx/>. Date of Access.
- interviews LastName, FirstName. Type of Interview. Date.
- list works cited in alphabetical order at the end of the paper starting on a new page
- APA (see Purdue OWL)
- citations (Author, Year, p.PageNumber)
- works cited LastName, FirstName. (Year). Title. City:Publisher.
- Chicago
- CBE
- ACM
- MLA (see Purdue OWL)
- expression
- argument flow
- paragraphing
- circle the topic sentence in each
- clarify your points
- read out loud - use your auditory system - fix the jumps
Presentation/Publication
- source: Parberry, Ian (2000) How to Present a Paper in Theoretical Computer Science: A Speaker's Guide for Students, Dept. Comp. Sc., Univ North Texas. Denton, Texas.
What to Say How to Say it
- communicate key ideas
- emphasize key ideas
- skip standard, obvious, or complicated
- don't get bogged down in details
- you have been thinking deeply for months
- audience has not - is the paper worth reading?
- details are out of place - leave them in the paper
- structure your talk
- break into distinct parts
- use a top-down approach
- introduction
- informal description - impressions are important
- define the problem
- motivate the audience
- explain why it is so important
- introduce terminology
- discuss earlier work
- emphasize contributions of your paper
- this may be the only points audience will remember
- provide a road-map to the talk
- body
- abstract the major results or contributions
- explain the significance of the results
- sketch a proof of the crucial results
- gloss over the technical details
- technicalities
- present a key result
- give the flavour of the rest of the technical details in a short period of time
- present it carefully
- fill in small gaps
- mention points that may not be in the paper itself
- present a key result
- conclusion
- hindsight is clear than foresight
- make observation that would have been confusing earlier
- regain the attention of non-experts in the audience
- state open problems
- identify problems that arise from your paper
- mention weaknesses of your paper
- indicate that your talk is over
- hindsight is clear than foresight
- introduction
Delivery - Getting through to your Audience
- use repetition
- "tell them what you're going to tell them. Tell them. Tell them what you told them
- remind, don't assume
- if your paper assumes a standard result, state it as a reminder
- don't over-run
- conference presentations last 15 to 30 minutes with 5 minutes for questions
- if short on time, cut the technicalities section
- maintain eye contact
- spread your attention, don't concentrate on one person
- control your voice
- avoid fashion, hype, information-free utterances
- control your motion
- avoid hyperactivity
- use natural gestures
- take care of your appearance
- avoid ostentatiousness
- minimize language difficulties
- try not to get anxious
- prepare adequately beforehand
- do not pay undue attention to the reaction of the most important person in the audience - their reactions may be the result of something that is totally unrelated to your presentation
- to calm panic, pause, close your eyes, and take a few deep breaths
- it is the quality of your research that matters
Visual and Aural Aids
- make legible slides
- don't put too much on a slide - remember short-term memory
- don't use too many slide- reserve 2 minutes per slide
- use colour effectively - avoid rainbows - yellow is almost invisible
- pictures and tables
- pictures are worth a thousand words
Question Time
- expect three types of questions
- genuine request for knowledge
- selfish - draws attention to the questioner - indirectly compliment them
- malicious - expect to have your ego bruised - be prepared, be polite, and avoid lengthy exchanges - offer a one-to-one discussion afterwards
Resources
- General
- Writing Labs
- Stylesheets
- Classification