</tr>

<td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>

<td>Used about 50-60% of my CPU power.</td>

<td>This test ran runs a bit smoother on Chromium, and only took used 30-roughly 40% CPU power.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>62</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td> <td>It stutters a lot.</td> <td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td> <td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td> </tr> <tr> <td>63</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/waterfall/ WaterFall]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>Slowed down over time</td> <td>Only the first 10 seconds was smooth.</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>64</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/another-world-js/ Another World JS]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>Ran well, no issues.</td> <td>Ran smoothly as well.</td> <td>Movements responded well to input.</td> <td>This is test run at about 10 FPS higher on Minefield than on Chromium.</td> </tr>

<!td>66</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/graph-- Test Nolayout/ Graph Layout]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>This test would not launch. --</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>62This test ran very well in Chromium, it was fast and responsive.</td> </tr> <tr> <!-- Test Name --td>67</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rottenscroll-clock/ RottenScroll Clock]</td> <!-- Tester -td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>Slight lag</td> <td>Noticeably choppy</td> <td>N/A</td> <td>Ran smoother in Chromium</td> </tr> <tr> <td>68</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/crystal-galaxy/ Crystal Galaxy]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <td>15/09/2010</td> <td>This game ran very well, no lag issues.</td> <td>The Graphics were very smooth.</td> <td>Input was very responsive.</td> <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran the game well.</td> </tr> <tr> <!-- Date --td>69</td> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/aquarium/ Aquarium]</td> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td>

<!-- Firefox Performance - Speed--> <td>Slight lag.</td> <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness--> <td>It was choppy every couple seconds for only a couple ms.</td> <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness--> <td>Was a bit unresponsive due to lag.</td> <!-- Notes and other Details --> <td>Chromium seemed to have taken up more CPU resources but still performed a little better.</td>

<tr> <!-- Test No. --> <td>70</td> <!-- Test Name --> <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/sketchpad/ Sketchpad]</td> <!-- Tester --> <td>[http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/User:Blaw1 Brian Law]</td> <!-- Date -->

<!-- Firefox Performance - Speed--> <td>Ran very fast.</td> <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness--> <td>N/A</td> <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness--> <td>Input was very responsive.</td> <!-- Notes and other Details --> <td>Both Minefield and Chromium ran this test very well.</td>

</table>