Difference between revisions of "Winter 2010 Presentations/VMs+Emulation"
(→Discovery) |
(→Discovery) |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
=Discovery= | =Discovery= | ||
− | The ARM virtual machines are not a viable solution for | + | The ARM virtual machines are not a viable solution for our Fedora-Arm Koji Farm. The additional compilation times that can amount to ten times slower than that of the OpenRD client really come into affect when compiling large packages which is not acceptable. The OpenRD clients were inexpensive and almost three OpenRD clients can be purchased at the cost of one of the existing machines. |
=Results= | =Results= |
Revision as of 10:51, 20 April 2010
Contents
Title
Virtual Machines By: Daniel Gilloch (dgilloch@learn.senecac.on.ca)
Introduction
The goal was to attempt to install a hypervisor on an already existing machine for our koji build farm and determine whether or not this would be a viable developement solution. Some issues taken into consideration:
- Cost
- Setup
- Performance
Approach
Determining and comparing the cost of buying arm machines, vs utilizing already existing hardware.
Determining the process of setting up virtual machines and the setup of an arm machine.
A Performance benchmark using koji build as this is a real world example of the exact type of developement that will be done on the machines.
Also taken into consideration is if other environmental effects on the machine could interfer with build times.
Process
Cost
OpenRD-Base: 149.99
OpenRD-Client: 249.99
Q6600 Existing Machine: apprx, $700 CAD
Installation
Arm Emulation
The chosen hypervisor to run Fedora-ARM under Fedora was QEMU. QEMU was chosen over other hypervisors as it is a well known emulator that supports ARM platforms.
Libvirt
Libvirt is a virtualization management framework and is full of useful tools. Libvirt provides tools such as “virsh” virtualization shell, as well as the “virt-manager” GUI tool that
manipulates the command-line virtual machine management tools.
Installing and starting the virtualization software
yum groupinstall virtualization
yum install qemu-system-arm
service libvirtd start
Installing the ARM root filesystem and XML
cd /var/lib/libvirt/images
wget http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/fedora/qemu/zImage-versatile-2.6.24-rc7.armv5tel \
http://cdot.senecac.on.ca/arm/arm1.xml \
http://cdot.senecac.on.ca/arm/arm1.img.gz
gunzip arm1.img.gz
restorecon *
virsh define arm1.xml
Booting the Virtual Machine
Currently there seems to be an issue while running SELinux and Arm emulation under libvirt management. To bypass this problem, issue the command
“setenforce 0”.
The virtual machine should now be bootable and can be accessed using the virt-manager tool located (Applications>System Tools>Virtual Machine Manager)
Or from the command line: virsh start arm1
Alternatively, you can access the graphical display using the virt-viewer command: virt-viewer arm1
Creating Additional ARM Virtual Machines
In order to create additional ARM virtual machines:
Make a new copy of the arm1.img file under a different name in /var/lib/libvirt/images
Edit the XML, making the following changes:
1. Change the UUID (you can use uuidgen to generate a new one)
2. Change the image filename (in the source tag in the devices section) to point to the new image file you just created.
Use virsh define nameOfXMLFile to define the new VM from the modified XML file.
Performance
In order to benchmark the virtual machines and the openrd client the most ideal situation was to run time along with building
in koji as this is the intended purpose of the machines and virtual machines. I selected a package and built it multiple times
on both the virtual machine and the openrd client to ensure consistancy. The Openrd client's results were very consistant at a build
time of about 17 minutes, however the virtual machine's build times were sparatic. They ranged from 25 minutes to an hour depending
on the work being done.
Discovery
The ARM virtual machines are not a viable solution for our Fedora-Arm Koji Farm. The additional compilation times that can amount to ten times slower than that of the OpenRD client really come into affect when compiling large packages which is not acceptable. The OpenRD clients were inexpensive and almost three OpenRD clients can be purchased at the cost of one of the existing machines.