Difference between revisions of "DPS909"
(→Grading) |
|||
(21 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==[http://www.senecacollege.ca/cgi-bin/subject?s1=DPS909 Subject Description]== | ==[http://www.senecacollege.ca/cgi-bin/subject?s1=DPS909 Subject Description]== | ||
− | This course introduces students to the technological, social, and pragmatic aspects of developing open source software through direct involvement in | + | This course introduces students to the technological, social, and pragmatic aspects of developing open source software through direct involvement in large open source projects. Students will learn to use the tools, techniques, and strategies of open source developers. This is a project-based programming course. |
==Course Outcomes== | ==Course Outcomes== | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Describe the history and philosophy of an open source project | * Describe the history and philosophy of an open source project | ||
* Choose between the various open source licenses understanding the implications for users, developers, and the software community in general | * Choose between the various open source licenses understanding the implications for users, developers, and the software community in general | ||
− | * Use the communication modes particular to the open source world through participation in such things as | + | * Use the communication modes particular to the open source world through participation in such things as GitHub, mailing lists, wikis, etc. |
* Use the tools of open source development, for example: distributed revision control; documentation tools; automated build and test systems; debuggers; source code utilities; tracking systems; on-line resources, etc. | * Use the tools of open source development, for example: distributed revision control; documentation tools; automated build and test systems; debuggers; source code utilities; tracking systems; on-line resources, etc. | ||
* Work with a pre-existing large source code base | * Work with a pre-existing large source code base | ||
* Write software that integrates and interacts with existing open source systems. For example: add-ons; bug fixes; new features; etc. | * Write software that integrates and interacts with existing open source systems. For example: add-ons; bug fixes; new features; etc. | ||
− | * Work collaboratively with fellow students and members of the | + | * Work collaboratively with fellow students and members of the open source community. |
==Major Project== | ==Major Project== | ||
− | This is a project course, and the majority of each student’s mark will come from work done on a real development project. The primary goal of this project is to get students involved in the | + | This is a project course, and the majority of each student’s mark will come from work done on a real development project. The primary goal of this project is to get students involved in the open source development community and its codebases. Through this experience students will learn about the processes, tools, and practices involved in developing software as part of a large open source community. |
===Philosophy=== | ===Philosophy=== | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Second, consider the typical restrictions on peer-collaboration. In this project students are encouraged to work together, to help one another, to look at each other's code, etc. Open source collaboration is about leveraging the collective knowledge of a community to help solve the problems of the individual. | Second, consider the typical restrictions on peer-collaboration. In this project students are encouraged to work together, to help one another, to look at each other's code, etc. Open source collaboration is about leveraging the collective knowledge of a community to help solve the problems of the individual. | ||
− | Third, consider the sharp dividing line between student projects in most programming courses. For the most part, students are evaluated on their ability to do a particular project or to solve a particular problem on their own. The outcome is measured against peer outcomes. However, in this course students are not in competition with their peers; rather, they are all working on one large project ( | + | Third, consider the sharp dividing line between student projects in most programming courses. For the most part, students are evaluated on their ability to do a particular project or to solve a particular problem on their own. The outcome is measured against peer outcomes. However, in this course students are not in competition with their peers; rather, they are all working on one large project (e.g., Mozilla) with many sub-projects within it. As a result, there is no clean line to divide one student’s work from another, or even student work from that of the open source community. This means that collaboration between students and even other members of the open source community is acceptable practice. |
To summarize, students should: | To summarize, students should: | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* Give others encouragement and credit when they offer help | * Give others encouragement and credit when they offer help | ||
* Use existing open source code whenever possible | * Use existing open source code whenever possible | ||
− | * Be open to helping others and to being helped | + | * Be open to helping others and to being helped |
==Intellectual Property== | ==Intellectual Property== | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Detailed grading information will be discussed later in the term. Below is a breakdown of how students will be graded, and [http://blog.humphd.org/vocamus-680/?p=680 this blog post] gives more details about the rationale: | Detailed grading information will be discussed later in the term. Below is a breakdown of how students will be graded, and [http://blog.humphd.org/vocamus-680/?p=680 this blog post] gives more details about the rationale: | ||
− | * ''' | + | * '''80%''' - Project Deliverables (e.g., code, Pull Requests, documentation), marked in terms of quality, quantity, process, etc. |
− | ** ''' | + | ** '''10%''' - [[OSD & DPS909 Winter 2019 Release 0.1|Release 0.1]] due Wed, Jan 30 |
− | ** ''' | + | ** '''30%''' - [[OSD & DPS909 Winter 2019 Release 0.2|Release 0.2]] due Wed, Mar 6 |
− | ** '''20%''' - 0.3 Release | + | ** '''20%''' - [[OSD & DPS909 Winter 2019 Release 0.3|Release 0.3]] due Fri, Mar 22 |
− | ** '''20%''' - 0.4 Release | + | ** '''20%''' - [[OSD & DPS909 Winter 2019 Release 0.4|Release 0.4]] due Wed, Apr 10 |
− | * '''20%''' - Blog | + | * '''20%''' - Labs/Blog: will be marked Done/Not Done (i.e., no subjective grading will be applied). Students are expected to complete all course labs in order to pass the course. |
− | |||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
− | * [[DPS909 & OSD600 Winter | + | * [[DPS909 & OSD600 Winter 2019]] |
+ | * [https://seneca-open-source.slack.com Seneca Open Source Slack] (sign-up with your @myseneca.ca email) | ||
* [http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/~chris.tyler/planet/ Open Source@Seneca Planet] | * [http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/~chris.tyler/planet/ Open Source@Seneca Planet] | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
* [[DPS909 Fall 2015|Fall 2015]] | * [[DPS909 Fall 2015|Fall 2015]] | ||
* [[DPS909 Winter 2017|Winter 2017]] | * [[DPS909 Winter 2017|Winter 2017]] | ||
+ | * [[DPS909 Fall 2017|Fall 2017]] | ||
+ | * [[DPS909 Winter 2018|Winter 2018]] | ||
+ | * [[DPS909 Fall 2018|Fall 2018]] | ||
[[Category:DPS909]] | [[Category:DPS909]] |
Revision as of 12:54, 15 January 2019
Contents
Topics in Open Source Development
Subject Description
This course introduces students to the technological, social, and pragmatic aspects of developing open source software through direct involvement in large open source projects. Students will learn to use the tools, techniques, and strategies of open source developers. This is a project-based programming course.
Course Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this course students should be able to:
- Discuss the issues and currents in open source and open source development
- Describe the history and philosophy of an open source project
- Choose between the various open source licenses understanding the implications for users, developers, and the software community in general
- Use the communication modes particular to the open source world through participation in such things as GitHub, mailing lists, wikis, etc.
- Use the tools of open source development, for example: distributed revision control; documentation tools; automated build and test systems; debuggers; source code utilities; tracking systems; on-line resources, etc.
- Work with a pre-existing large source code base
- Write software that integrates and interacts with existing open source systems. For example: add-ons; bug fixes; new features; etc.
- Work collaboratively with fellow students and members of the open source community.
Major Project
This is a project course, and the majority of each student’s mark will come from work done on a real development project. The primary goal of this project is to get students involved in the open source development community and its codebases. Through this experience students will learn about the processes, tools, and practices involved in developing software as part of a large open source community.
Philosophy
Many of the practices inherent in open source development will seem to go against the structures often set in place for similar course work. For example, students are typically forbidden to collaborate with peers, to copy from the web, etc. However, these rules must be re-evaluated in the context of proper and pragmatic open source development practices.
First, consider the typical rules around cheating and plagiarism. In this assignment, students are encouraged to work within the set of best practices natural to open source development. Open source developers do not write from scratch what already exists and is freely available for use. Students should be thinking in terms of code reuse. It is acceptable for students to use code from other open source projects, so long as the license is amenable to the use.
Second, consider the typical restrictions on peer-collaboration. In this project students are encouraged to work together, to help one another, to look at each other's code, etc. Open source collaboration is about leveraging the collective knowledge of a community to help solve the problems of the individual.
Third, consider the sharp dividing line between student projects in most programming courses. For the most part, students are evaluated on their ability to do a particular project or to solve a particular problem on their own. The outcome is measured against peer outcomes. However, in this course students are not in competition with their peers; rather, they are all working on one large project (e.g., Mozilla) with many sub-projects within it. As a result, there is no clean line to divide one student’s work from another, or even student work from that of the open source community. This means that collaboration between students and even other members of the open source community is acceptable practice.
To summarize, students should:
- Help each other, contribute to one another’s projects
- Work with and within the open source community
- Give others encouragement and credit when they offer help
- Use existing open source code whenever possible
- Be open to helping others and to being helped
Intellectual Property
Given that this course is focused on open source development, and given that students work on real open source codebases, all student work will become open source. The particular license used will be determined based on the particular project and open source project.
Grading
Detailed grading information will be discussed later in the term. Below is a breakdown of how students will be graded, and this blog post gives more details about the rationale:
- 80% - Project Deliverables (e.g., code, Pull Requests, documentation), marked in terms of quality, quantity, process, etc.
- 10% - Release 0.1 due Wed, Jan 30
- 30% - Release 0.2 due Wed, Mar 6
- 20% - Release 0.3 due Fri, Mar 22
- 20% - Release 0.4 due Wed, Apr 10
- 20% - Labs/Blog: will be marked Done/Not Done (i.e., no subjective grading will be applied). Students are expected to complete all course labs in order to pass the course.
Resources
- DPS909 & OSD600 Winter 2019
- Seneca Open Source Slack (sign-up with your @myseneca.ca email)
- Open Source@Seneca Planet