154
edits
Changes
→Centre for Academic Excellence
** VL (Valerie Lopes)'s opinion
*** finds verbs 'model' and 'implement' questionable
*** third part of outcome should answer the question why learn this
*** thinks that CVS (Credential Validation Service) would not accept these outcomes
*** thinks that PEQAB (Post-Secondary Education Quality Assessment Board) would not accept these outcomes
*** finds insufficient difference between OOP344 and BTP300 outcomes
** CS's response
*** proposed learning outcomes are in the three-part format as outlined by the CAE - action verb | field of knowledge | assessment criteria*** verbs of the two-dimensional matrix shown above express learning taxonomy for programming subjects much notably better than popular generic verbs of hierarchical verbstaxonomies
*** 'model' and 'implement' are ComSci jargon that differentiate productive activity in the construction of artifacts and have well-understood and specific meanings to subject experts
*** assessment criteria for assessment trumps trump the question 'why learn this' as the third part of the outcome statement*** presently there is agreement amongst between diploma and degree coordinators regarding differences between OOP344 and BTP300
== To Be Done ==
